首页> 外文期刊>Oil and Gas Reporter >Arbitration: Judicial Review
【24h】

Arbitration: Judicial Review

机译:仲裁:司法审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In 1999, Bangor enters into a contract with HQUS to build a pipeline from an existing trunk pipeline to an end user in Maine. The contract calls for a fixed annual charge, payable monthly, for a fifteen-year period. Bangor does not build the pipeline with a direct connection to the trunk pipeline. Instead it contracts with the owner of the trunk pipeline for the owner to build a 410-foot lateral pipeline that will connect the trunk pipeline with the Bangor pipeline. The lateral segment is not mentioned in the Bangor/HQUS contract. For several years, HQUS makes it monthly payments and Bangor compensates the trunk pipeline for the use of the lateral. In 2006, HQUS learns of the existence of the lateral. At the same time Bangor is acquired by its parent. The parent then raises the issue that it is in violation of the FERC's "shipper-must-have-title" rule because Bangor does not have title to the gas being transported through the lateral.
机译:1999年,Bangor与HQUS签订了一份合同,以建立一条从现有干线管道到缅因州最终用户的管道。合同要求在15年内每月支付固定的年度费用。 Bangor不会直接连接到干线管道来构建管道。取而代之的是,它与干线管道的所有者签约,以使所有者建立一条410英尺的横向管道,该管道将干线管道与Bangor管道相连。 Bangor / HQUS合同中未提及侧向段。几年来,HQUS每月支付一次费用,而Bangor会为使用支管补偿主干管道。在2006年,HQUS了解到了侧面的存在。同时,班戈被其母公司收购。然后,父母提出了一个问题,即它违反了FERC的“托运人必须拥有的所有权”规则,因为Bangor对通过支管运输的天然气没有所有权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号