...
首页> 外文期刊>Biological Conservation >Are urban forests ecological traps for understory birds? An examination using Northern cardinals.
【24h】

Are urban forests ecological traps for understory birds? An examination using Northern cardinals.

机译:城市森林是林下鸟类的生态陷阱吗?使用北部红衣主教的考试。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many studies have reported increased numbers of certain synanthropic species in urbanizing landscapes, but few have evaluated if urban habitats constitute ecological traps for these species. The Northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) was used as a model species to evaluate if urban riparian forests might act as ecological traps for understorey-nesting birds. Cardinals were surveyed within 2-ha riparian forest plots within rural (n=6) and urban (n=6) landscapes in Ohio, USA during breeding and non-breeding seasons 2003-2005. Cues used by cardinals to select habitats were identified based on measurements surrounding 219 nests and in 106 randomly-located plots and 96 systematically-located plots. Productivity of 161 cardinal pairs and survival of 180 adults were monitored from late March-September, 2003-2005. Cardinals were 1.7x (in the breeding season) to nearly 4x (in non-breeding season) more abundant in urban than rural forests, and the results suggest that these differences in abundance stemmed from urban-associated changes in habitat and microclimate features used by cardinals to select habitats. Most notably, cardinals were strongly associated with dense understorey vegetation and warmer minimum January temperatures, both of which were promoted as urban development increased within the landscapes surrounding riparian forests. Although other studies suggest mismatches between the habitat cues used by cardinals and how those features affect nesting success (e.g., higher nest predation in exotic shrubs), these results provide no evidence that urban forests were acting as ecological traps for cardinals. Instead, cardinals in urban and rural forests had similar numbers of nesting attempts, young fledged over the breeding season, and apparent annual survival rates. Thus, these findings do not support for the idea that urban forests in central Ohio represent ecological traps for synanthropic understorey birds..
机译:许多研究报告称,城市化景观中某些合人类物种的数量增加,但很少有人评估城市栖息地是否构成了这些物种的生态圈套。北部红衣主教(Cardinalis cardinalis)被用作模型物种,以评估城市河岸森林是否可能充当下层嵌套鸟类的生态陷阱。在2003-2005年的繁殖和非繁殖季节,对美国俄亥俄州乡村(n = 6)和城市(n = 6)景观的2公顷河岸森林地块进行了红衣主教调查。根据围绕219个巢的测量以及在106个随机分布的地块和96个系统分布的地块中的测量,确定了枢机主教用来选择栖息地的线索。从2003年3月至9月下旬,监测了161个主要对的生产力和180个成年人的生存。与农村森林相比,城市中的红衣主教丰富度是繁殖季节的1.7倍(非繁殖季节)的近4倍,结果表明,丰度的这些差异是由城市相关的栖息地和小气候特征的变化引起的红衣主教选择栖息地。最值得注意的是,红衣主教与茂密的林下植被和一月的最低温度强烈相关,这两者都随着沿河森林周围景观的城市发展而得到促进。尽管其他研究表明,红衣主教使用的栖息地线索与这些特征如何影响筑巢成功之间存在不匹配(例如,异国灌木丛中更高的巢捕食性),但这些结果没有提供任何证据表明城市森林是红衣主教的生态陷阱。取而代之的是,城市和乡村森林中的红衣主教进行了类似的筑巢次数,幼鸟在繁殖季节就羽化了,而且明显的年成活率。因此,这些发现并不支持以下观点:俄亥俄州中部的城市森林代表着合人类下层鸟类的生态陷阱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号