首页> 外文期刊>Resources policy >Reply: Investor demand and spot commodity prices
【24h】

Reply: Investor demand and spot commodity prices

机译:答复:投资者需求和现货商品价格

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In a recent article (Tilton, Humphreys, and Radetzki, 2011), Tilton et al. argue that even when investor stocks are declining an increase in investor demand can cause a commodity's price to rise. They contend that this conclusion, which is based on two hypothetical examples, is both contrary to conventional wisdom and counter-intuitive. In my comment on the article (Olle Ostensson, 2011), I challenged this finding. In a reply to my article, Tilton et al. maintain that their original finding is valid: investor demand can be driving commodity prices higher even when stocks are falling. In my present reply, I contend that their argument with respect to the first example confuses the actions of a minority of investors with those of all investors and is well accommodated within the framework of traditional theory. 1 further argue that their second example rests on an assumption regarding investor behavior that is unproven and that in any case falls outside the framework of analysis of futures markets.
机译:在最近的一篇文章中(Tilton,Humphreys和Radetzki,2011年),Tilton等人。他们认为,即使投资者的股票正在下降,投资者的需求增加也会导致商品价格上涨。他们认为,这个基于两个假设示例的结论既违背了传统观点,又违反了直觉。在我对文章的评论(Olle Ostensson,2011年)中,我对这一发现提出了挑战。在回复我的文章时,Tilton等人。坚持他们最初的发现是正确的:即使在库存下降的情况下,投资者的需求也可能推动商品价格上涨。在我目前的答复中,我认为他们关于第一个例子的论点使少数投资者的行为与所有投资者的行为相混淆,并且很好地适应了传统理论的框架。 1进一步论证说,他们的第二个例子是建立在关于投资者行为的假设上的,这一假设未经证实,并且无论如何都不属于期货市场分析框架之内。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号