首页> 外文期刊>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. Biological Sciences >Unchanging visions: the effects and limitations of ocular stillness
【24h】

Unchanging visions: the effects and limitations of ocular stillness

机译:不变的视觉:眼部静止的影响和局限性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Scientists have pondered the perceptual effects of ocular motion, and those of its counterpart, ocular stillness, for over 200 years. The unremitting ' trembling of the eye ' that occurs even during gaze fixation was first noted by Jurin in 1738. In 1794, Erasmus Darwin documented that gaze fixation produces perceptual fading, a phenomenon rediscovered in 1804 by Ignaz Paul Vital Troxler. Studies in the twentieth century established that Jurin ' s ' eye trembling ' consisted of three main types of ' fixational ' eye movements, now called microsaccades (or fixational saccades), drifts and tremor. Yet, owing to the constant and minute nature of these motions, the study of their perceptual and physiological consequences has met significant technological challenges. Studies starting in the 1950s and continuing in the present have attempted to study vision during retinal stabilization-a technique that consists on shifting any and all visual stimuli presented to the eye in such a way as to nullify all concurrent eye movements-providing a tantalizing glimpse of vision in the absence of change. No research to date has achieved perfect retinal stabilization, however, and so other work has devised substitute ways to counteract eye motion, such as by studying the perception of afterimages or of the entoptic images formed by retinal vessels, which are completely stable with respect to the eye. Yet other research has taken the alternative tack to control eye motion by behavioural instruction to fix one ' s gaze or to keep one ' s gaze still, during concurrent physiological and/or psychophysical measurements. Here, we review the existing data-from historical and contemporary studies that have aimed to nullify or minimize eye motion-on the perceptual and physiological consequences of perfect versus imperfect fixation. We also discuss the accuracy, quality and stability of ocular fixation, and the bottom-up and top-down influences that affect fixation behaviour.
机译:200 多年来,科学家们一直在思考眼球运动的感知效果,以及与之对应的眼部静止的感知效果。即使在注视过程中也会出现持续的“眼睛颤抖”,这是朱林在1738年首次注意到的。1794年,伊拉斯谟·达尔文(Erasmus Darwin)记录了凝视注视会产生知觉衰减,这一现象于1804年由伊格纳兹·保罗·维塔尔·特罗克斯勒(Ignaz Paul Vital Troxler)重新发现。二十世纪的研究表明,朱林的“眼睛颤抖”包括三种主要类型的“注视”眼球运动,现在称为微扫视(或注视扫视)、漂移和震颤。然而,由于这些运动的持续性和微小性,研究它们的感知和生理后果遇到了重大的技术挑战。从 1950 年代开始并持续到现在的研究试图研究视网膜稳定期间的视力——一种技术,包括以消除所有同时发生的眼球运动的方式改变呈现给眼睛的任何和所有视觉刺激——在没有变化的情况下提供诱人的视觉一瞥。然而,迄今为止,还没有研究实现完美的视网膜稳定,因此其他工作已经设计了抵消眼球运动的替代方法,例如通过研究对残影或视网膜血管形成的内视图像的感知,这些图像相对于眼睛是完全稳定的。然而,其他研究采取了另一种策略,通过行为指导来控制眼球运动,以在同时进行的生理和/或心理物理测量中固定一个人的视线或保持一个人的视线静止。在这里,我们回顾了现有的数据 - 来自历史和当代研究,旨在消除或最小化眼球运动 - 关于完美与不完美注视的感知和生理后果。我们还讨论了眼球注视的准确性、质量和稳定性,以及影响注视行为的自下而上和自上而下的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号