首页> 外文期刊>journal of clinical and diagnostic research >A Comparative Evaluation of the Body Fat Percentage using Bioelectrical Impedance Analyser, Skin-fold Thickness Measurement and BMI
【24h】

A Comparative Evaluation of the Body Fat Percentage using Bioelectrical Impedance Analyser, Skin-fold Thickness Measurement and BMI

机译:使用生物电阻抗分析仪、皮肤褶皱厚度测量和 BMI 对体脂百分比进行比较评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

As there is a global increase in the number of people with obesity world-wide, there is an increasing need for estimation of body composition especially, the calculation of Body Fat (BF) percentage for treatment and prevention of obesity. Hence, the present study deals with the estimation of BF percentage using three methods.Aim: To compare the percentage of BF obtained by bioelectrical impedance method with percentage BF obtained by two other methods, {Skin-fold Thickness Measurements (STM) and Body Mass Index (BMI)}, in healthy subjects.Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional, observational study was conducted on 50 healthy male subjects of the age group 25-55 years in a tertiary care hospital in Rajamahendravaram, Andhra Pradesh, India. BF percent measured using Karada scan HBF-701, compared with percentage BF as calculated by Siri equation (from the sum of skin fold thickness measured at four places-Triceps, Biceps, Suprailiac and Subscapular areas) and percentage BF calculated from BMI. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software version 20 and MS-Excel-2007 by Pearson Correlation Coefficient test and ANOVA.Results: Mean value of percent BF assessed by bioelectrical impedance was 18.27±3.32, mean BF percentage from Siri equation was 23.33±2.75 and mean BF from BMI was 19.55±3.22 the results showed significant difference in percent BF by different methods. Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) underestimated BF when compared to other two methods. There was a statistically significant positive co-relation between Karada scan and BMI (r is 0.336, p is 0.017).Conclusion: According to the results of the study, we can conclude that bioelectrical impedance analyser underestimated BF percentage when compared to other two methods (skinfold thickness measurements and BMI) though there was a positive correlation between BF measurements by BIA and other two methods.
机译:随着全球肥胖人数的增加,对身体成分的估计需求越来越大,特别是计算体脂 (BF) 百分比以治疗和预防肥胖。因此,本研究使用三种方法估计BF百分比。目的:比较健康受试者通过生物电阻抗法获得的 BF 百分比与通过其他两种方法获得的 BF 百分比,{皮肤褶皱厚度测量 (STM) 和体重指数 (BMI)}。材料和方法:在印度安得拉邦 Rajamahendravaram 的一家三级医院对 50 名 25-55 岁年龄组的健康男性受试者进行了一项横断面观察性研究。使用 Karada 扫描 HBF-701 测量的 BF 百分比,与 Siri 公式计算的百分比 BF(来自在四个地方(肱三头肌、二头肌、髂上和肩胛下区域)测量的皮肤褶皱厚度之和)和根据 BMI 计算的 BF 百分比。使用SPSS软件版本20和MS-Excel-2007通过Pearson相关系数检验和方差分析进行统计分析。结果:生物电阻抗评估的BF百分比平均值为18.27±3.32,Siri方程的平均BF百分比为23.33±2.75,BMI的平均BF为19.55±3.22,结果显示不同方法的BF百分比差异显著。与其他两种方法相比,生物电阻抗分析(BIA)低估了BF。Karada 扫描与 BMI 之间存在统计学上的显着正相关关系(r 为 0.336,p 为 0.017)。结论:根据研究结果,我们可以得出结论,与其他两种方法(皮褶厚度测量和BMI)相比,生物电阻抗分析仪低估了BF百分比,尽管BIA和其他两种方法的BF测量之间存在正相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号