首页> 外文期刊>Oncology letters. >Efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta?analysis
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta?analysis

机译:肝动脉输注化疗联合免疫检查点抑制剂和酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗晚期肝细胞癌的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

At present, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often applied to patients who are not suitable or are unwilling to undergo surgical treatment. However, to the best of our knowledge, the efficacy and safety of HAIC combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in HCC have not been fully demonstrated. Published studies involving the treatment of patients with HCC with HAIC, ICIs and TKIs were searched from public databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Sinomed. Efficacy and safety data for each study, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs) were collected. The present study included 17 treatment groups from 15 studies, including 1,987 patients with HCC in the systematic review. The target population was dominated by those unsuitable for surgical treatment, with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B or C, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2 and Child-Pugh score A or B. The results showed that the longest estimated median PFS (95 CI) in the HAIC + ICI/TKI therapy group (group C) was 9.37 months (95 CI, 6.81-11.93); in the HAIC therapy group (group B) was 7.45 months (95 CI, 6.45-8.46); and in the ICIs + other systemic therapies group (group A) was 5.92 months (95 CI, 5.31-6.54). There was no significant difference in the expected OS among the three groups, which may be because OS events were not reached in numerous studies during the follow-up time. The incidence of treatment-related adverse effects, such as increased AST 14/221 (6.33), increased ALT 13/221 (5.88), and decreased platelet count 13/221 (5.88), was not significantly increased in group C when compared with groups A or B (P>0.05). In conclusion, the effectiveness of HAIC + ICI/TKI for the treatment of advanced HCC was better than that of ICIs + other systemic therapies or HAIC alone. In addition, the incidence of AEs above grade 3 was not significantly higher compared with that in the other treatment groups, and the safety profile was good.
机译:目前,肝细胞癌(HCC)治疗肝动脉输注化疗(HAIC)常应用于不适合或不愿接受手术治疗的患者。然而,据我们所知,HAIC联合免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)和酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)治疗HCC的疗效和安全性尚未得到充分证明。从公共数据库(包括PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Sinomed)中检索涉及HAIC、ICIs和TKI治疗HCC患者的已发表研究。收集了每项研究的疗效和安全性数据,包括无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和不良事件(AEs)。本研究纳入了来自15项研究的17个治疗组,包括系统评价中的1,987例HCC患者。目标人群以不适合手术治疗的人群为主,巴塞罗那诊所肝癌 B 期或 C 期,东部肿瘤合作组体能状态 ≤2 和 Child-Pugh 评分 A 或 B。结果显示,HAIC+ICI/TKI治疗组(C组)最长的估计中位PFS(95%CI)为9.37个月(95%CI,6.81-11.93);HAIC治疗组(B组)为7.45个月(95%CI,6.45-8.46);ICIs+其他全身治疗组(A组)为5.92个月(95%CI,5.31-6.54)。三组的预期OS无显著差异,这可能是因为在随访期间,许多研究均未达到OS事件。与A组或B组相比,C组治疗相关不良反应的发生率没有显著增加,如AST升高[14/221(6.33%)]、ALT升高[13/221(5.88%)]和血小板计数降低[13/221(5.88%)](P>0.05)。综上所述,HAIC+ICI/TKI治疗晚期HCC的疗效优于ICIs+其他全身治疗或单独使用HAIC。此外,与其他治疗组相比,3级以上不良事件的发生率没有显著升高,安全性良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号