首页> 外文期刊>nuclear medicine and molecular imaging >Comparison of Two Different Segmentation Methods on Planar Lung Perfusion Scan with Reference to Quantitative Value on SPECT/CT
【24h】

Comparison of Two Different Segmentation Methods on Planar Lung Perfusion Scan with Reference to Quantitative Value on SPECT/CT

机译:平面肺灌注扫描中两种不同分割方法的比较,参考 SPECT/CT 的定量值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose Until now, there was no single standardized regional segmentation method of planar lung perfusion scan. We compared planar scan based two segmentation methods, which are frequently used in the Society of Nuclear Medicine, with reference to the lung perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) derived values in lung cancer patients. Methods Fifty-five lung cancer patients (male:female, 37:18; age, 67.8 +/- 10.7 years) were evaluated. The patients underwent planar scan and SPECT/CT after injection of technetium-99 m macroaggregated albumin (Tc-99 m-MAA). The uptake and predicted postoperative percentage forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppoFEV1) derived from both posterior oblique (PO) and anterior posterior (AP) methods were compared with SPECT/CT derived parameters. Concordance analysis, paired comparison, reproducibility analysis and spearman correlation analysis were conducted. Results The uptake derived from PO method showed higher concordance with SPECT/CT derived uptake in every lobe compared to AP method. Both methods showed significantly different lobar distribution of uptake compared to SPECT/CT. For the target region, ppoFEV1 measured from PO method showed higher concordance with SPECT/CT, but lower reproducibility compared to AP method. Preliminary data revealed that every method significantly correlated with actual postoperative FEV1, with SPECT/CT showing the best correlation. Conclusion The PO method derived values showed better concordance with SPECT/CT compared to the AP method. Both PO and AP methods showed significantly different lobar distribution compared to SPECT/CT. In clinical practice such difference according to different methods and lobes should be considered for more accurate postoperative lung function prediction.
机译:目的 到目前为止,平面肺灌注扫描还没有单一的标准化区域分割方法。我们比较了核医学会常用的两种基于平面扫描的分割方法,并参考了肺癌患者的肺灌注单光子发射计算机断层扫描 (SPECT)/计算机断层扫描 (CT) 衍生值。方法 选取55例肺癌患者(男:女,37:18;年龄,67.8+/- 10.7岁)进行评估。患者在注射锝-99 m大聚集白蛋白(Tc-99 m-MAA)后进行了平面扫描和SPECT/CT。将后斜 (PO) 和前后 (AP) 方法得出的 1 秒内用力呼气容积百分比和预测的术后用力呼气容积百分比与 SPECT/CT 衍生参数进行比较。进行了一致性分析、配对比较、重现性分析和斯皮尔曼相关性分析。结果 与AP法相比,PO法得出的摄取百分比与SPECT/CT得出的各叶摄取百分比具有更高的一致性。与SPECT/CT相比,两种方法的摄取百分比叶分布显著不同。对于目标区域,与AP方法相比,PO法测得的ppoFEV1%与SPECT/CT的一致性更高,但重现性较低。初步数据显示,每种方法均与实际术后FEV1%显著相关,其中SPECT/CT相关性最佳。结论 与AP法相比,PO法得出的值与SPECT/CT的一致性更好。与SPECT/CT相比,PO和AP方法均显示出显著差异的肺叶分布。在临床实践中,应考虑不同方法和肺叶的这种差异,以便更准确地预测术后肺功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号