首页> 外文期刊>Pharmaciana >Comparison between clinic and home measurements of blood pressure, total cholesterol, blood sugar to identify 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score
【24h】

Comparison between clinic and home measurements of blood pressure, total cholesterol, blood sugar to identify 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score

机译:比较诊所和家庭测量血压、总胆固醇、血糖以确定 10 年动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险评分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The clinical guideline recommends home monitoring for hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia maintenance therapy. The study aimed to compare the 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk calculated using systolic blood pressure, fasting total-cholesterol, and fasting blood sugar measured at the clinic and home. This analytical cross-sectional study was done in population from villages in Sleman District, Yogyakarta. The subjects were selected purposively with the criteria of 40-79 years old and signing the informed consent. The home-measured systolic blood pressure was monitored with a digital sphygmomanometer and peripheral finger-stick methods for cholesterol and blood sugar. On the same occasion, the clinic measurements were monitored with a mercury sphygmomanometer for systolic blood pressure, and with venous plasma analyzed in the laboratory for cholesterol and blood glucose. Measurements between methods were compared with paired T-tests. The subjects (n=171) had a mean age of 52.6 (8.1) years; 21.6 were male. The systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, and blood glucose from clinic and home measurement were 130.0 (21.1) mmHg and 137.6 (22.4) mmHg (p<0.001); 202.8 (32.8) mg/dl and 205.2 (44.8) mg/dl (p= 0.44); and 98.5 (42.9) mg/dl and 91.9 (34.6) mg/dl (p<0.001) respectively. The average ASCVD risks of the clinic and home measurements were 6.4 (6.2) and 7.1 (6.9) (p<0.001); however, both methods had the same ASCVD risk category at borderline risk (5-<7.5). Conclusion: The ASCVD risk scores calculated using clinic and home measurements were statistically different.
机译:临床指南建议对高血压、糖尿病和高脂血症维持治疗进行家庭监测。该研究旨在比较使用收缩压、空腹总胆固醇和在诊所和家中测量的空腹血糖计算的 10 年动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病 (ASCVD) 风险。这项分析横断面研究是在日惹斯莱曼区村庄的人口中进行的。受试者是以 40-79 岁的标准有目的地选择的,并签署知情同意书。使用数字血压计和外周指尖方法监测家庭测量的收缩压,以监测胆固醇和血糖。在同一场合,用水银血压计监测诊所的收缩压,并在实验室分析静脉血浆的胆固醇和血糖。将方法之间的测量值与配对 T 检验进行比较。受试者(n=171)的平均年龄为52.6(8.1)岁;21.6%为男性。门诊和家庭测得的收缩压、总胆固醇和血糖分别为130.0(21.1)mmHg和137.6(22.4)mmHg(p<0.001);202.8 (32.8) mg/dL 和 205.2 (44.8) mg/dL (p= 0.44);分别为 98.5 (42.9) mg/dL 和 91.9 (34.6) mg/dL (P<0.001)。诊所和家庭测量的平均ASCVD风险分别为6.4(6.2)%和7.1(6.9)%(p<0。001);然而,两种方法在临界风险(5-<7.5%)下具有相同的ASCVD风险类别。结论:使用诊所和家庭测量计算的ASCVD风险评分在统计学上存在差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号