...
首页> 外文期刊>Mineralium deposita >Origin of the Rubian carbonate-hosted magnesite deposit Galicia, NW Spain: mineralogical, REE, fluid inclusion and isotope evidence
【24h】

Origin of the Rubian carbonate-hosted magnesite deposit Galicia, NW Spain: mineralogical, REE, fluid inclusion and isotope evidence

机译:西班牙西北部加利西亚鲁比安碳酸盐质菱镁矿床的成因:矿物学,稀土元素,流体包裹体和同位素证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Rubian magnesite deposit (West Asturian-Leonese Zone, Iberian Variscan belt) is hosted by a 100-m-thick folded and metamorphosed Lower Cambrian carbonate/siliciclastic metasedimentary sequence-the Candana Limestone Formation. It comprises upper (20-m thickness) and lower (17-m thickness) lens-shaped ore bodies separated by 55 m of slates and micaceous schists. The main (lower) magnesite ore body comprises a package of magnesite beds with dolomite-rich intercalations, sandwiched between slates and micaceous schists. In the upper ore body, the magnesite beds are thinner (centimetre scale mainly) and occur between slate beds. Mafic dolerite dykes intrude the mineralisation. The mineralisation passes eastwards into sequence of bedded dolostone (Buxan) and laminated to banded calcitic marble (Mao). These show significant Variscan exten-sional shearing or fold-related deformation, whereas neither Rubian dolomite nor magnesite show evidence of tectonic disturbance. This suggests that the dolomitisation and magnesite formation postdate the main Variscan deformation. In addition, the morphology of magnesite crystals and primary fluid inclusions indicate that magnesite is a neoformed hydrothermal mineral. Magnesite contains irregularly distributed dolomite inclusions (<50 mu m) and these are interpreted as relics of a metasomatically replaced dolostone precursor. The total rare earth element (REE) contents of magnesite are very similar to those of Buxan dolostone but are depleted in light rare earth elements (LREE); heavy rare earth element concentrations are comparable. However, magnesite REE chondrite normalised profiles lack any characteristic anomaly indicative of marine environment. Compared with Mao calcite, magnesite is distinct in terms of both REE concentrations and patterns. Fluid inclusion studies show that the mineralising fluids were MgO_2-NaCl-CaCl_2-H_2O aqueous brines exhibiting highly variable salinities (3.3 to 29.5 wt. percent salts). This may be the result of a combination of fluid mixing, migration of pulses of variable-salinity brines and/or local dissolution and replacement processes of the host dolostone. Fluid inclusion data and comparison with other N Iberian dolostone-hosted metasomatic deposits suggest that Rubian magnesite probably formed at temperatures between 160 and 200 deg C. This corresponds, at hydrostatic pressure (500 bar), to a depth of formation of ~5 km. Mineralisation-related Rubian dolomite yields delta~(l8)O values (delta~(18)O: 12.0-15.4 per thousand, mean: 14.4 + - 1.1 per thousand) depleted by around 5 per thousand compared with barren Buxan dolomite (delta~(18)O: 17.1-20.2 per thousand, mean: 19.4 + - 1.0 per thousand). This was interpreted to reflect an influx of ~(18)O -depleted waters accompanied by a temperature increase in a fluid-dominated system. Overlapping calculated delta~(18)O_(fluid) values (approx +5 per thousand at 200 deg C) for fluids in equilibrium with Rubian dolomite and magnesite show that they were formed by the same hydrothermal system at different temperatures. In terms of delta~(13)C values, Rubian dolomite (delta~(13)C: -1.4 to 1.9 per thousand, mean: 0.4 + - 1.3 per thousand) and magnesite (delta~(13)C: -2.3 to 2.4 per thousand, mean: 0.60 + - 1.0 per thousand) generally exhibit more negative delta~(13)C values compared with Buxan dolomite (delta~(13)C: -0.2 to 1.9 per thousand, mean: 0.8 + - 0.6 per thousand) and Mao calcite (delta~(13)C: -0.3 to 1.5 per thousand, mean: 0.6 + - 0.6 per thousand), indicating progressive modification to lower S C values through interaction with hydrothermal fluids. ~(87)Sr/~(86)Sr ratios, calculated at 290 Ma, vary from 0.70849 to 0.70976 for the Mao calcite and from 0.70538 to 0.70880 for the Buxan dolostone. The ~(87)Sr/~(86)Sr ratios in Rubian magnesite are more radiogenic and range from 0.71123 to 0.71494. The combined delta~(8)C -delta~(13)C and ~(87)Sr/~(86)Sr r data indicate that the magne-site-related fluids were modifi
机译:鲁比斯菱镁矿床(西阿斯图里亚斯-利昂斯带,伊比利亚瓦里斯卡纳带)由一个厚度为100 m的褶皱和变质的下寒武统碳酸盐岩/硅弹性变质沉积层序-Candana石灰岩岩层组成。它包括上部(厚度为20 m)和下部(厚度为17 m)的透镜状矿体,由55 m的板岩和云母片岩隔开。菱镁矿的主要(下部)主体包括一整套菱镁矿床,中间夹有板岩和云母片岩,富含白云石。在上矿体中,菱镁矿床较薄(主要是厘米级),出现在板岩床之间。镁铁质白云石岩侵入矿化。矿化作用向东进入层状白云岩(Buxan)层序,然后层压到带状钙质大理石(Mao)上。这些显示出明显的瓦里斯卡纳伸展剪切或与褶皱有关的变形,而鲁比安白云岩和菱镁矿均未显示出构造扰动的证据。这表明白云岩化和菱镁矿的形成要晚于主要的瓦里斯坎变形。此外,菱镁矿晶体和主要流体包裹体的形态表明菱镁矿是一种新形成的热液矿物。菱镁矿包含不规则分布的白云石包裹体(<50微米),这些被解释为交代替代的白云岩前驱体的遗迹。菱镁矿的稀土元素总量(REE)与Buxan白云岩非常相似,但其中的轻稀土元素(LREE)贫乏。重稀土元素的浓度是可比的。然而,菱镁矿球粒陨石归一化剖面缺乏任何指示海洋环境的特征异常。与毛方解石相比,菱镁矿在稀土元素浓度和分布方式上都明显不同。流体包裹体研究表明,矿化流体是MgO_2-NaCl-CaCl_2-H_2O盐​​水,其盐分变化很大(盐的含量为3.3%至29.5%)。这可能是由于流体混合,盐度可变的盐水的脉冲迁移和/或主体白云岩的局部溶解和置换过程的组合所致。流体包裹体数据以及与其他由伊比利亚白云岩组成的其他交代沉积物的对比表明,鲁比菱镁矿可能在160至200摄氏度之间形成。这在静水压力(500 bar)下对应于约5 km的形成深度。与贫化的Buxan白云石相比,与矿化有关的Rubian白云石的δ〜(18)O值(delta〜(18)O:每千个12.0-15.4,平均值:14.4±1.1)减少了约千分之五。 (18)O:每千分之17.1-20.2,平均值:每千分之19.4 +-1.0”。这被解释为反映了〜(18)O耗尽的水的涌入,伴随着以流体为主的系统中温度的升高。与鲁比白云石和菱镁矿平衡的流体的重叠计算的δ〜(18)O_(流体)值(在200摄氏度下大约为每千个+5)表明,它们是由同一水热系统在不同温度下形成的。就δ〜(13)C值而言,鲁比安白云岩(δ〜(13)C:-1.4至1.9 /千,平均值:0.4 +-1.3 /千)和菱镁矿(δ〜(13)C:-2.3至-1.3与Buxan白云石相比,千分之2.4(平均值:0.60 +-1.0)表现出更大的负δ〜(13)C值(δ〜(13)C:-0.2至1.9 /千,平均值:0.8 +-0.6和方解石(δ〜(13)C:-0.3至1.5 /千,平均值:0.6 +-0.6 /千),表明通过与水热流体相互作用逐渐降低了SC值。在290 Ma下计算的〜(87)Sr /〜(86)Sr之比,对于毛方解石为0.70849至0.70976,对于Buxan白云岩为0.70538至0.70880。鲁比菱镁矿的〜(87)Sr /〜(86)Sr比具有更高的放射成因,范围为0.71123至0.71494。 δ(8)C-δ〜(13)C和〜(87)Sr /〜(86)Sr r的组合数据表明,与镁矿位有关的流体被改性

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号