...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cancer education: the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education >Comparison of Training via Short Messages and Group Training on Level of Knowledge and Practice of Middle-Aged Women About Breast Cancer Screening Tests
【24h】

Comparison of Training via Short Messages and Group Training on Level of Knowledge and Practice of Middle-Aged Women About Breast Cancer Screening Tests

机译:

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study is aimed to compare the effect of two methods of short messages and group training on level of knowledge and practice of middle-aged women about breast cancer screening procedures. This clinical trial study was done on 210 women aged 40-60years in Mahshahr city, Iran. Eligible middle-aged women were randomly assigned in two groups of short message (n=105) and group training (n=105). Data collected through a questionnaire which included three parts (demographic, knowledge and practice of women about breast cancer and screening procedures). Group training was educated for two sessions in 2weeks that each session lasted 2h. In the short message group, every woman received texts about breast cancer, reasons, and preventive methods, three times a week, for 2weeks. The questionnaire (knowledge and practice) was completed 2months after educational intervention. Data was analyzed using independent t test, paired t test, and chi-square. Results of this study showed that average score of knowledge in two groups increased significantly, from 34.4 +/- 7.54 to 40. 8 +/- 7.18 in the short text messages (SMS) and from 35 to 39.75 in the group training (P0.05). Also, the score of breast examination by health provider in the SMS group was significantly higher than that in the group training, but the score of breast self-examination in the group training was higher than that in the short message (P0.05). The results showed that training by each way is effective to increase knowledge and performance of women about breast cancer screening methods. Further studies to compare the cost-effectiveness of two methods are recommended.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号