...
首页> 外文期刊>Eurosurveillance >Community use of face masks and similar barriers to prevent respiratory illness such as COVID-19: a rapid scoping review
【24h】

Community use of face masks and similar barriers to prevent respiratory illness such as COVID-19: a rapid scoping review

机译:

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Evidence for face-mask wearing in the community to protect against respiratory disease is unclear. Aim To assess effectiveness of wearing face masks in the community to prevent respiratory disease, and recommend improvements to this evidence base. Methods We systematically searched Scopus, Embase and MEDLINE for studies evaluating respiratory disease incidence after face-mask wearing (or not). Narrative synthesis and random-effects meta-analysis of attack rates for primary and secondary prevention were performed, subgrouped by design, setting, face barrier type, and who wore the mask. Preferred outcome was influenza-like illness. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) quality assessment was undertaken and evidence base deficits described. Results 33 studies (12 randomised control trials (RCTs)) were included. Mask wearing reduced primary infection by 6 (odds ratio (OR): 0.94; 95 CI: 0.75–1.19 for RCTs) to 61 (OR: 0.85; 95 CI: 0.32–2.27; OR: 0.39; 95 CI: 0.18–0.84 and OR: 0.61; 95 CI: 0.45–0.85 for cohort, case–control and cross-sectional studies respectively). RCTs suggested lowest secondary attack rates when both well and ill household members wore masks (OR: 0.81; 95 CI: 0.48–1.37). While RCTs might underestimate effects due to poor compliance and controls wearing masks, observational studies likely overestimate effects, as mask wearing might be associated with other risk-averse behaviours. GRADE was low or very low quality. Conclusion Wearing face masks may reduce primary respiratory infection risk, probably by 6–15. It is important to balance evidence from RCTs and observational studies when their conclusions widely differ and both are at risk of significant bias. COVID-19-specific studies are required.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号