...
首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of engineering geology and the environment >Comparative analysis of five convolutional neural networks for landslide susceptibility assessment
【24h】

Comparative analysis of five convolutional neural networks for landslide susceptibility assessment

机译:5种卷积神经网络滑坡易发性评估的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

To evaluate the performance of deep learning methods on the landslide susceptibility mapping, five different convolutionalneural networks (CNN)-AlexNet, Inception-v3, Xception, ResNet-101, and DenseNet-201-were employed to predict thelandslide susceptibility along a transmission line. Ten landslide influencing factors were extracted from three databases andconsidered in the input layers. The landslide (10,481 grids) and non-landslide (10,481 grids) data were randomly subdividedinto 70 (14,673 grids) and 30 (6289 grids) to construct the training and validation samples, respectively. The appropriatearchitecture and training parameters were carefully selected after many attempts until the training and validation accuracywas above 90. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, landslide density (LD), and landslide ratio (LR) weredetermined to estimate the five CNN networks’ prediction accuracy. All CNN networks had high area-under-the-curve(AUC) values when assessing landslide susceptibility, and most landslides occurred in the outputs with predicted high andvery high landslide susceptibility (LD > 65 and LR > 2.90). Generally, CNN networks had a higher accuracy than the twotraditional methods due to the powerful capability of deep feature extraction. Additionally, the computational time cost inthree steps was recorded to investigate the efficiency of five CNN networks, and all CNN networks accomplished the goalswithin an acceptable time using a commercially available computer (~ 24 h). Comparatively, AlexNet and Xception hadbetter performance than other networks on the landslide susceptibility assessment.
机译:为了评估深度学习方法在滑坡易感性映射中的性能,采用5种不同的卷积神经网络(CNN)-AlexNet、Inception-v3、Xception、ResNet-101和DenseNet-201-来预测输电线路的滑坡易感性。从3个数据库中提取了10个滑坡影响因素,并在输入层中进行了考虑。将滑坡(10,481个网格)和非滑坡(10,481个网格)数据随机细分为70%(14,673个网格)和30%(6289个网格)分别构建训练样本和验证样本。经过多次尝试,精心选择合适的架构和训练参数,直到训练和验证准确率达到90%以上。通过测定受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、滑坡密度(LD)和滑坡比(LR)来估计5个CNN网络的预测精度。在评估滑坡易感性时,所有CNN网络都具有较高的曲线下面积(AUC)值,并且大多数滑坡发生在预测的高和非常高滑坡易感性的输出中(LD > 65%,LR > 2.90)。一般来说,CNN网络由于具有强大的深度特征提取能力,比两种传统方法具有更高的准确性。此外,记录了三个步骤的计算时间成本,以研究五个CNN网络的效率,所有CNN网络都使用商用计算机(~24 h)在可接受的时间内完成了目标。相比之下,AlexNet和Xception在滑坡易感性评估中的表现优于其他网络。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号