Should the location of distal tibial plating be influenced by the varus or valgus fracture pattern of tibial pilon fracture?

摘要

Abstract Introduction Operative treatment of tibial pilon fracture is challenging. There is a lack of consensus and only one clinical study on the optimal location of distal tibial plating for fixation of pilon fractures based on varus or valgus fracture patterns. We hypothesize that complications rates, specifically mechanical complications, are not influenced by the location of the tibial plating in the fixation of pilon fractures with respect to varus or valgus fracture patterns.Materials and methods Sixty-nine patients who had single plating for tibial pilon from 2007 to 2017 were recruited. They were divided into two groups, transverse fibular fracture (varus fracture pattern) and comminuted fibular fracture (valgus fracture pattern). Our primary outcome measure was any mechanical complications as a result of the location of plating (medial vs lateral) on varus or valgus fracture patterns.Results There were 38 (55.1) patients with varus fracture pattern and 31 (44.9) patients with valgus fracture pattern tibial pilon fractures. In the varus fracture pattern group, mechanical complications were not significantly different between the two plating locations (27.3 vs 33.3, p?>?0.05). Notably, there were more fibula fixations performed in patients with medial plating (74.1 vs 45.5, p?=?0.092) when compared those with lateral plating in the varus fracture pattern group. There were also no statistically significant differences found although 10 (40) out of 25 patients had mechanical complications in the medial plating group compared to 1 (16.7) out of 6 patients with lateral plating (p?=?0.383) in the valgus fracture pattern group.Conclusion There were no differences in mechanical complications for medial vs lateral plating in tibial pilon fracture based on varus or valgus deforming forces. As much as we should consider the fracture patterns and deforming forces when deciding on plating location, other factors such as careful soft tissue management and fragment-specific fixation should be prioritized.