首页> 外文期刊>Expert review of neurotherapeutics >Interventions to promote the evidence-based care of children with ADHD in primary-care settings.
【24h】

Interventions to promote the evidence-based care of children with ADHD in primary-care settings.

机译:在初级保健机构中进行干预以促进对多动症儿童进行循证护理。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a commonly occurring behavioral disorder among children. Community-based physicians are often the primary providers of services for children with ADHD. A set of consensus guidelines has been published by the American Academy of Pediatrics that provides best-practice diagnostic procedures for primary-care physicians. These recommendations emphasize the importance of using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria as the basis for making an ADHD diagnosis and conducting systematic follow-up, including the collection of parent and teacher ratings scales to quantitatively assess response to treatment. Although these recommendations have been widely disseminated and their adoption actively promoted, guideline adherence, in general, is known to be poor. Two types of intervention models, ancillary service and office systems modification, have been proposed to promote adoption of evidence-based ADHD practice in primary-care settings. The present article reviews the efficacy of these intervention models, and discusses the cost and sustainability of each model as related to feasibility of intervention dissemination.
机译:注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)是儿童中常见的行为障碍。社区医生通常是为多动症儿童提供服务的主要提供者。美国儿科学会已经发布了一套共识指南,为初级保健医师提供了最佳实践的诊断程序。这些建议强调了使用《精神疾病诊断和统计手册》第四版标准作为进行多动症诊断和进行系统随访的基础的重要性,包括收集家长和教师的评分量表,以定量评估对治疗的反应。尽管已经广泛传播了这些建议,并积极促进了这些建议的采用,但众所周知,一般而言,准则的遵循性很差。已经提出了两种类型的干预模型,即辅助服务和办公系统修改,以促进在基层医疗机构中采用基于证据的多动症。本文回顾了这些干预模型的有效性,并讨论了与干预传播的可行性相关的每种模型的成本和可持续性。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号