...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >If we have bandwagons, magic bullets, and theoretical constructs, why do we need randomized clinical trials in transfusion medicine and perioperative hemostasis?
【24h】

If we have bandwagons, magic bullets, and theoretical constructs, why do we need randomized clinical trials in transfusion medicine and perioperative hemostasis?

机译:如果我们有潮流,魔术子弹和理论结构,为什么我们需要在输血医学和围手术期止血方面进行随机临床试验?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This invited commentary is not so much about science as it is about our lack of knowledge in transfusion medicine and perioperative hemostasis and about how this lack of knowledge affects our practice. As suggested by the title, the intent of this discourse is to be provocative but certainly not contemptuous. Despite widespread collection and administration of red blood cells (81 million units are collected annually worldwide; http://www.who.int/bloodsafety/FactFile2009.pdf), transfusion practice is based on meagre good quality evidence.
机译:这篇受邀的评论与其说是科学,不如说是因为我们对输血医学和围手术期止血知识的缺乏以及对知识的缺乏如何影响我们的实践。正如标题所暗示的那样,这种论述的目的是挑衅,但绝对不能轻视。尽管广泛地收集和管理红细胞(全世界每年收集8100万个单位; http://www.who.int/bloodsafety/FactFile2009.pdf),但输血实践是基于微不足道的高质量证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号