...
【24h】

Heating the nation

机译:加热国家

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

It was one of those 'bright ideas': create a short video about the woodfuel industry. After I attended a woodfuel conference, I began to question why "if woodfuel was so good, why wasn't it being taken up more fully by the commercial and domestic sector"?The documentary was born and I wanted it to serve a couple of purposes: as information to prospective woodfuel clients and as an overarching view on the industry. I gained the impression that the industry, as a whole, is just not getting its messageacross. Why not? Many interviewees told me about how woodchip was comparable on price to mains gas, that pellets were around the price of heating oil, and that when the renewable heat incentive was taken into account, woodfuel was cheaper. Existing end-users were talking of payback periods from 6-10 years on a 100 000 installation, with phrases, such as, "it was a no-brainer". Why isn't the take-up greater?
机译:这是那些“聪明的主意”之一:制作关于木材燃料行业的简短视频。在参加一次木燃料会议之后,我开始质疑为什么“如果木燃料如此好,为什么商业和家庭部门无法充分利用它呢?”这部纪录片诞生了,我希望它能为几个用途:作为向潜在的木燃料客户提供的信息以及对行业的总体看法。我给人的印象是,整个行业只是没有传达其信息。为什么不?许多受访者告诉我,木片在价格上可与干线汽油相比,颗粒物在取暖油的价格附近,并且考虑到可再生热激励措施,木质燃料更便宜。现有的最终用户正在谈论100000装置的6-10年的投资回收期,并使用诸如“这是理所当然的”之类的短语。为什么接收量不大?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号