首页> 外文期刊>Geological Society of America Bulletin >Forms and processes of two highly contrasting rivers in arid central Australia,and the implications for channel-pattern discrimination and prediction
【24h】

Forms and processes of two highly contrasting rivers in arid central Australia,and the implications for channel-pattern discrimination and prediction

机译:澳大利亚中部干旱地区两条强烈对比的河流的形式和过程,以及对河道模式识别和预测的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Description and quantification of the diverse controls on alluvial-river styles have long been key themes in the fluvial literature,but many uncertainties and contentions remain.On the Northern Plains in arid central Australia,ephemeral rivers are commonly low sinuosity (P<1.15) but vary from single thread to anabranching,thus providing an opportunity to examine concepts of channel-pattern discrimination and prediction.Comparison of the closely adjacent middle reaches of the Plenty and Marshall Rivers demonstrates that although channel-bed gradient,discharge,and bank strength are essentially similar,bed-material caliber and the pattern of tributary drainage are markedly different.These differences result in strong contrasts in channel cross-sectional geometry and planform.The Plenty River,which transports medium to coarse sand and is joined by few tributaries,remains predominantly single thread but is variably wide (approx100-1200 m) and in places appears transitional to braiding.By contrast,the Marshall River,which transports coarse sand to granules and is joined by several minor tributaries,has numerous narrow (usually<60 m wide),anabranching channels that divide around vegetated ridges and broader islands.It is important to note that whereas channel-pattern discrimination diagrams predict that hydraulic,sedimentary,and energy conditions are conducive to the development of meandering or braiding on these rivers,both the Plenty and the individual Marshall anabranches remain essentially single-thread,planar-bed,low-sinuosity ("straight") channels.This fact appears to be due primarily to the high degree of bank strength provided by riparian vegetation and secondarily to certain flow and sediment-transport conditions characteristic of these ephemeral rivers.In particular,field observations and theoretical model results suggest that (1) a wide,single-thread channel relatively free of in-channel trees is sufficient to convey a sandy bed-material load (the Plenty),but (2) where tributaries provide small supplies of water that encourage the growth of obstructing in-channel trees or introduce some additional coarse sediment,then the formation of narrow anabranches minimizes flow roughness and maintains sediment throughput (the Marshall).Hence,although major changes in fluvial processes can be produced by subtle differences in water and sediment supply,the resulting channel patterns cannot be predicted by traditional discrimination diagrams that are based solely on simple combinations of morphometric,hydraulic,and/or sedimentary variables.
机译:冲积河样式的各种控制方法的描述和量化一直是河流文献的主要主题,但仍存在许多不确定性和争论。在澳大利亚中部干旱的北部平原,短暂河流通常呈低曲度(P <1.15),但从单线程到分支,各有不同,因此提供了机会来研究渠道模式的辨别和预测的概念。普伦蒂河和马歇尔河中游紧邻的中游地区的比较表明,尽管渠道床的坡度,流量和河岸强度基本上是相似的河床口径和支流排水方式明显不同。这些差异导致河道横截面几何形状和平面形貌形成强烈对比。单线但宽度可变(大约100-1200 m),在某些地方似乎过渡到编织。相反,马歇尔河将粗砂输送成颗粒,并由几个小支流汇合,有许多狭窄(通常<60 m宽)的支流河道,围绕着植被的山脊和更宽的岛屿。请注意,尽管河道模式识别图预测,在这些河流上,水力,沉积和能量条件都有利于蜿蜒或编织,无论是丰盛河还是个别马歇尔河环礁基本上都保持单线,平面床,低弯曲度(“直“”通道。这一事实似乎主要归因于河岸植被提供的高岸强度,其次归因于这些短暂河流特有的某些水流和泥沙输送条件。特别是,实地观测和理论模型结果表明( 1)一条相对较宽的单线程通道,通道内没有树木,足以传送沙床物料负荷(大量),但是(2 )如果支流提供少量水以鼓励阻塞通道内树木的生长或引入一些额外的较粗的沉积物,则狭窄的枝条的形成可最大程度地减少水流不平并保持沉积物的通过量(马歇尔)。因此,尽管河流的主要变化水和沉积物供应的细微差别可能会产生这种过程,传统的判别图不能完全依靠形态,水力和/或沉积变量的简单组合来预测所产生的通道模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号