首页> 外文期刊>European urology >Reply from authors re: Ithaar H. Derweesh, Paul Russo. to Clamp or Not to Clamp the Main Renal Artery: The Debate Continues. Eur Urol 2014;66:720-21: Clamping Is a 'necessary' Evil, Not a Desirable Ideal
【24h】

Reply from authors re: Ithaar H. Derweesh, Paul Russo. to Clamp or Not to Clamp the Main Renal Artery: The Debate Continues. Eur Urol 2014;66:720-21: Clamping Is a 'necessary' Evil, Not a Desirable Ideal

机译:作者的回复:保罗·鲁索(Italar H. Derweesh),保罗·鲁索(Paul Russo)。夹紧或不夹紧主肾动脉:辩论仍在继续。 Eur Urol 2014; 66:720-21:夹紧是“必要的”邪恶,而不是理想的理想

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We address the four main issues raised in the editorial [1]. First, the concern about transfusion rates is fair; however, a closer look at our data shows that this issue is already being addressed [2]. Our data represent the very initial patients undergoing superselective, anatomic partial nephrectomy (PN) surgery and thus reflect, in part, the obligatory "developmental curve" inherent to a novel technique. Initially, we enrolled virtually all comers regardless of tumor complexity. As Derweesh and Russo note [1], these were complex tumors: 30% were pTlb or higher, and mean RENAL score was 8 (up to 11). With experience, we have learned that large, laterally located, broad-based tumors with significant parenchymal contact surface area result in larger PN defect and increased chance of transfusion (unpubl. data, S. Leslie)
机译:我们处理社论中提出的四个主要问题[1]。首先,对输血速度的担忧是合理的;然而,仔细研究我们的数据表明,这个问题已经得到解决[2]。我们的数据代表了刚开始接受超选择性解剖局部肾切除术(PN)手术的患者,因此部分反映了新技术固有的强制性“发育曲线”。最初,无论肿瘤的复杂性如何,我们几乎招募了所有角膜癌患者。正如Derweesh和Russo所指出的那样[1],它们是复杂的肿瘤:30%的患者是pTlb或更高,平均RENAL评分为8(最高11分)。通过经验,我们发现具有较大实质接触表面积的大型,侧卧,宽基性肿瘤会导致更大的PN缺损并增加输血的机会(公开数据,S。Leslie)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号