首页> 外文期刊>European urology >Mapping of pelvic lymph node metastases in prostate cancer
【24h】

Mapping of pelvic lymph node metastases in prostate cancer

机译:前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结转移的定位

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Opinions about the optimal lymph node dissection (LND) template in prostate cancer differ. Drainage and dissemination patterns are not necessarily identical. Objective: To present a precise overview of the lymphatic drainage pattern and to correlate those findings with dissemination patterns. We also investigated the relationship between the number of positive lymph nodes (LN+) and resected lymph nodes (LNs) per region. Design, setting, and participants: Seventy-four patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma were prospectively enrolled. Patients did not show suspect LNs on computed tomography scan and had an LN involvement risk of ??10% but ??35% (Partin tables) or a cT3 tumor. Intervention: After intraprostatic technetium-99m nanocolloid injection, patients underwent planar scintigraphy and single-photon emission computed tomography imaging. Then surgery was performed, starting with a sentinel node (SN) procedure and a superextended lymphadenectomy followed by radical prostatectomy. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Distribution of scintigraphically detected SNs and removed SNs per region were registered. The number of LN+, as well as the percentage LN+ of the total number of removed LNs per region, was demonstrated in combining data of all patients. The impact of the extent of LND on N-staging and on the number of LN+ removed was calculated. Results and limitations: A total of 470 SNs were scintigraphically detected (median: 6; interquartile range [IQR]: 3-9), of which 371 SNs were removed (median: 4; IQR: 2.25-6). In total, 91 LN+ (median: 2; IQR: 1-3) were found in 34 of 74 patients. The predominant site for LN+ was the internal iliac region. An extended LND (eLND) would have correctly staged 32 of 34 patients but would have adequately removed all LN+ in only 26 of 34 patients. When adding the presacral region, these numbers increased to 33 of 34 and 30 of 34 patients, respectively. Conclusions: Standard eLND would have correctly staged the majority of LN+ patients, but 13% of the LN+ would have been missed. Adding the presacral LNs to the template should be considered to obtain a minimal template with maximal gain. Note: This manuscript was invited based on the 2011 European Association of Urology meeting in Vienna. ? 2012 European Association of Urology.
机译:背景:关于前列腺癌最佳淋巴结清扫术(LND)模板的观点不同。排水和传播方式不一定相同。目的:提供淋巴引流模式的精确概述,并将这些发现与传播模式相关联。我们还研究了每个区域的阳性淋巴结数目(LN +)与切除的淋巴结数目(LNs)之间的关系。设计,背景和参与者:前瞻性纳入了74例局限性前列腺腺癌患者。患者在计算机断层扫描中未显示出可疑的LNs,LN累及风险为10%但35%(Partin表)或cT3肿瘤。干预:前列腺内注射99m纳米胶体后,患者进行了平面闪烁显像和单光子发射计算机断层显像。然后进行手术,从前哨淋巴结(SN)程序和超大型淋巴结清扫术开始,然后进行前列腺癌根治术。结果测量和统计分析:记录每个区域闪烁显像的SN和已去除SN的分布。通过合并所有患者的数据,可以证明LN +的数量以及每个区域中已移除LN总数的LN +百分比。计算了LND程度对N分期和去除的LN +数量的影响。结果与局限性:闪烁扫描共检测到470个SN(中位数:6;四分位间距[IQR]:3-9),其中371个SN被去除(中位数:4; IQR:2.25-6)。在74例患者中的34例中,总共发现91个LN +(中位数:2; IQR:1-3)。 LN +的主要部位是the内。扩展的LND(eLND)可以正确分期诊断34例患者中的32例,但仅能充分去除34例患者中的26例中的所有LN +。添加adding前区域时,这些数字分别增加到34名患者中的33名和34名患者中的30名。结论:标准eLND可以正确分期大多数LN +患者,但会漏掉13%的LN +。应该考虑将s前LN添加到模板中以获得具有最大增益的最小模板。注意:本手稿是根据2011年在维也纳举行的欧洲泌尿外科学会会议而邀请的。 ? 2012年欧洲泌尿外科协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号