首页> 外文期刊>European urology >A prognostic model for patients with metastatic renal cell cancer: what's new?
【24h】

A prognostic model for patients with metastatic renal cell cancer: what's new?

机译:转移性肾细胞癌患者的预后模型:新功能?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In recent years, there has been a shift in the management of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) from cytokines to agents that target the inhibition of angiogenic growth factors. Results of phase 3 trials with sunitinib, bevacizumab, temsirolimus, pazopanib, sorafenib, and everolimus have resulted in a new treatment paradigm for the management of mRCC [1]. The results of randomized phase 3 trials comparing bevacizumab with interferon (IFN)-alpha versus IFN-alpha alone established bevacizumab as a new standard, first-line treatment for mRCC. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly improved in the bevacizumab-plus-IFN group compared with the control group, with a higher response rate in the combination arm (31% vs 13%; p< 0.0001) (AVOREN trial) [2]. A second multicenter phase 3 trial, conducted in the United States and Canada by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB), confirmed previous results with PFS of 8.5 mo in patients receiving bevacizumab plus IFN versus 5.2 mo for patients receiving IFN monotherapy (p < 0.0001). The objective response rate was higher in patients receiving bevacizumab plus IFN (25.5%) than in those receiving IFN alone (13.1%, p< 0.0001) [3].
机译:近年来,转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者的治疗方法已从细胞因子转向靶向抑制血管生成生长因子的药物。舒尼替尼,贝伐单抗,西罗莫司,帕唑帕尼,索拉非尼和依维莫司的3期试验结果为mRCC的治疗提供了新的治疗范例[1]。将贝伐单抗与干扰素(IFN)-α与单独的IFN-α进行比较的随机3期试验结果将贝伐单抗确立为mRCC的新标准,一线治疗。与对照组相比,贝伐单抗加IFN组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)显着提高,联合组的应答率更高(31%vs 13%; p <0.0001)(AVOREN试验)[ 2]。癌症和白血病B组(CALGB)在美国和加拿大进行的第二项多中心3期试验证实了先前的结果,接受贝伐单抗加IFN的患者的PFS为8.5 mo,而接受IFN单药治疗的患者的PFS为5.2 mo(p < 0.0001)。接受贝伐单抗加干扰素治疗的患者的客观缓解率(25.5%)高于仅接受干扰素治疗的患者(13.1%,p <0.0001)[3]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号