...
首页> 外文期刊>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry >Application of normal-phase high-performance liquid chromatography followed by gas chromatography for analytics of diesel fuel additives
【24h】

Application of normal-phase high-performance liquid chromatography followed by gas chromatography for analytics of diesel fuel additives

机译:应用正相高效液相色谱法和气相色谱法分析柴油燃料添加剂

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The paper presents the results of investigations on new procedures of determination of selected cleaning additives in diesel fuel. Two procedures: one-step analysis using gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID) or mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and a two-step procedure in which normal-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (NP-HPLC) was used for preliminary separation of the additives, were compared. The additive fraction was collected using either simple elution or eluent backflush. Final determinations were performed by GC-FID and GC-MS. The studies revealed that it was impossible to determine the investigated analytes by one-step procedures, i.e. by using solely HPLC or GC. On the other hand, the use of a two-step procedure ensures reproducible results of determinations, and the limits of quantitation are, depending on the method of fraction collection by HPLC, from 1.4-2.2 ppm (GC-MS in SIM mode) to 9.6-24.0 ppm (GC-FID). Precision and accuracy of the developed procedures are compared, and possible determination errors and shortcomings discussed. Figure not available: see fulltext.
机译:本文介绍了对柴油中选定清洁添加剂的测定新程序的调查结果。比较了两种程序:使用气相色谱法和火焰电离检测 (GC-FID) 或质谱 (GC-MS) 进行一步分析,以及使用正相高效液相色谱 (NP-HPLC) 初步分离添加剂的两步程序。使用简单洗脱或洗脱液反冲洗收集添加剂馏分。最终测定由GC-FID和GC-MS进行。研究表明,不可能通过一步法(即仅使用HPLC或GC)来确定所研究的分析物。另一方面,使用两步法可确保测定结果的可重复性,并且定量限从1.4-2.2 ppm(SIM模式下的GC-MS)到9.6-24.0 ppm(GC-FID)不等。比较了所开发程序的精密度和准确性,并讨论了可能的测定错误和缺点。[图无:见全文。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号