...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Dentistry >Research Article Accuracy of Linear Measurements of Galileos Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Normal and Different Head Positions
【24h】

Research Article Accuracy of Linear Measurements of Galileos Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Normal and Different Head Positions

机译:在正常和不同头部位置下伽利略锥束计算机断层扫描的线性测量精度的研究文章

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Introduction. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of linear measurements in dry human skulls in ideal position and different deviated positions of the skull. Methods. 6 dry human skulls were included in the study. Opaque markers were attached to alveolar bone. Buccolingual and mesiodistal distances and heights were measured in 5 different regions of either jaws using a digital caliper. Radiographic distances were measured in ideal, rotation, tilt, flexion, and extension positions of the skulls. The physical and radiographic measurements were compared to estimate linear measurement accuracy. Results. The mean difference between physical measurements and radiographic measurements was 0.05 ± 0.45. There was a significant difference between physical measurements and radiographic measurements in ideal, rotation, tilt, and extension positions (P value < 0.05). Conclusions. The accuracy of measurements in GALILEOUS CBCT machine varies when the position of the skull deviates from ideal; however, the differences are not clinically significant.
机译:介绍。这项研究的目的是确定在干燥的人类头骨中,在理想位置和头骨的不同偏斜位置进行线性测量的准确性。方法。该研究包括6个干燥的人类头骨。不透明标记物附着在牙槽骨上。使用数字卡尺在两个颌骨的5个不同区域中测量颊舌和近中颌的距离和高度。在头骨的理想位置,旋转位置,倾斜位置,屈曲位置和伸展位置测量射线照相距离。比较了物理测量和射线照相测量以估计线性测量精度。结果。物理测量值与射线照相测量值之间的平均差为0.05±0.45。在理想位置,旋转位置,倾斜位置和伸出位置,物理测量值与射线照相测量值之间存在显着差异(P值<0.05)。结论当颅骨的位置偏离理想位置时,GALILEOUS CBCT机器的测量精度会有所不同;但是,差异在临床上并不显着。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号