首页> 外文期刊>Economic geology and the bulletin of the Society of Economic Geologists >Secular Variation of Magmatic Sulfide Deposits and Their Source Magmas
【24h】

Secular Variation of Magmatic Sulfide Deposits and Their Source Magmas

机译:岩浆硫化物矿床及其源岩浆的长期变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Magmatic sulfide deposits are divisible into two major groups, those that are valued primarily for their Ni and Cu and that are mostly sulfide rich (>10% sulfide), and those that are valued primarily for their PGE and tend to be sulfide poor (<5% sulfide). Most members of the Ni-Cu group formed as a result of an interaction of mantle-derived magma with the crust that gave rise to the early onset of sulfide immiscibility. Of the different classes of deposit in this group, the komatiite-related class ranges from 2.7 to 1.9 Ga in age, the Flood basaltrelated class from 1.1 to 0.25 Ga, and the Mg basalt- and basalt-related group from the Archean to the present. There is only one example each of anorthosite complex- and impact-related deposits, so that one cannot generalize about their secular distribution, except to say that anorthosite complexes are Proterozoic. Ural-Alaskan intrusions are dominantly Phanerozoic (some Archean deposits have been included with this group), but as yet no examples have been found with economic sulfide bodies. Seventy-five percent of known PGE resources occur in three intrusions-the Bushveld, Great Dyke, and Stillwater, the rocks all of which have crystallized from two magma types, an unusual, high SiO_2, MgO, and Cr and low Al_2O_3 type (U-type) that was emplaced at an early stage and a later, normal tholeiitic-type magma (T-type); the PGE are concentrated in layers close to the level at which the predominant crystallization switches from one magma type to the other. The U-type magma is interpreted as a PGE-rich, komatiitic magma (possibly the product of two-stage mantle melting) that has interacted to varying degrees with the crust, becoming SiO_2 enriched in this way. These three intrusions are Neoarchean to Paleoproterozoic in age. All known examples of komatiites, with one exception, are Paleoproterozoic or older and their secular distribution is thought to be due to cooling of the Earth. Known deposits do not occur in the oldest (>3.0 Ga) komatiites but appear at around 2.7Ga in continental (Kambalda, Western Australia) pr island-arc (Perseverance- Mount Keith, Western Australia) environments, possibly because it was these environments that offered the opportunity for interaction with felsic rocks. It is suggested that the development of these environments in the Archean was an additional control on the age distribution of these deposits. It is postulated that the restricted secular distribution of PGE-enhanced intrusions is also due to the need for a hot mantle to give rise to U-type magmas.
机译:岩浆状硫化物矿床可分为两大类,主要是由于其镍和铜而得名的矿床,大部分是富含硫化物(> 10%的硫化物),主要是因为它们的PGE矿床而往往缺乏硫化物(< 5%的硫化物)。 Ni-Cu组的大多数成员是由于地幔衍生的岩浆与地壳相互作用而形成的,该相互作用导致硫化物不溶混的提早出现。在该组中的不同类别的矿床中,与钾铁矿有关的类别年龄范围为2.7至1.9 Ga,与洪水玄武岩有关的类别范围为1.1至0.25 Ga,以及与镁质玄武岩和玄武岩有关的类别(从太古代到现在) 。钙长石复合物和与冲击有关的沉积物只有一个例子,因此人们不能一概而论,除非说钙长石复合物是元古代的。乌拉尔-阿拉斯加的入侵主要是杂多生代(该群中包括一些太古代沉积),但至今尚未发现经济硫化物的实例。已知PGE资源的75%来自三种侵入体-Bushveld,Great Dyke和Stillwater,它们的岩石均已从两种岩浆类型结晶,即异常的高SiO_2,MgO和Cr以及低的Al_2O_3类型(U型岩浆在早期和之后被放置在正常的普通型岩浆(T型)中; PGE集中在接近主要结晶从一种岩浆类型转换为另一种岩浆类型的水平的层中。 U型岩浆被解释为富含PGE的风化岩浆(可能是两阶段地幔熔融的产物),与地壳发生了不同程度的相互作用,从而使SiO_2富集。这三个时期是新元古代至古元古代的。除了一个例外,所有已知的科马铁矿实例都是古元古代或更古老的,它们的长期分布被认为是由于地球的冷却。已知的沉积物不出现在最古老的(> 3.0 Ga)科马铁矿中,而是在大陆弧(西澳大利亚州的坎巴尔达)或群岛弧(Perseverance-Mount Keith,西澳大利亚州)的环境中出现在约2.7Ga处,可能是因为这些环境提供了与长石岩石相互作用的机会。建议在太古宙这些环境的发展是对这些矿床年龄分布的额外控制。据推测,PGE增强侵入体的长期分布有限还归因于需要热幔以产生U型岩浆。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号