【24h】

EDITORIAL

机译:社论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Issues of IJPCP traditionally contain a broad range of reports from around the world, and this issue is no exception, being concerned with the outcome of psychosis, the introduction of electronic medical records into routine clinical practice, the problems experienced in general hospital settings, and a series of intriguing biological investigations.To start, Wolter and colleagues (Bad Zwischenahn, Germany) describe a naturalistic prospective evaluation of the one-year outcome among 106 patients with schizophrenia, which found that whilst almost 30% were significantly improved, only 13.2% met criteria for symptomatic remission at follow-up. This rather stark finding is balanced by the report from Wolstencroft and colleagues (Wollongong, Australia), which describes the development of a structured interview schedule to assess the stage of psychological recovery from enduring mental illness: in-depth interviews with 18 users of mental health services provide some support to the arguments of those who espouse a 'recovery' model, emphasising the need for affected individuals to accommodate to persistent psychotic symptoms.
机译:IJPCP的问题传统上包含来自世界各地的广泛报道,并且该问题也不例外,涉及精神病的后果,将电子病历引入常规临床实践,一般医院环境中遇到的问题以及首先,Wolter及其同事(德国Bad Zwischenahn)描述了对106位精神分裂症患者一年结局的自然前瞻性评估,发现虽然近30%的患者明显改善,但只有13.2%符合随访时症状缓解的标准。 Wolstencroft及其同事(澳大利亚伍伦贡市)的报告平衡了这一相当明显的发现,该报告描述了结构化访谈时间表的制定,以评估从持久性精神疾病中恢复心理的阶段:与18名心理健康用户的深入访谈服务为那些支持“恢复”模型的人的论点提供了一些支持,强调需要受影响的个体适应持续的精神病症状。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号