...
【24h】

Endovascular treatment of very small intracranial aneurysms.

机译:很小的颅内动脉瘤的血管内治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms 3 mm or less is considered controversial. The purpose of this study is to report angiographic and clinical results following coiling of such aneurysms and compare them to those of larger aneurysms (> 3 mm).Between November 1999 and November 2009 endovascular treatment was attempted in 956 consecutive intracranial aneurysms. Of 956 aneurysms, 111 aneurysms were very small aneurysms with a maximal diameter of 3 mm or less. We conducted a retrospective analysis of angiographic and clinical outcome following coiling of very small aneurysms and subsequently comparing it to the results of larger aneurysms.Coiling initially failed in eight aneurysms. In the remaining 103 aneurysms endovascular treatment was accomplished and immediate angiographic results showed complete aneurysm occlusion in 43 aneurysms, nearly complete aneurysm occlusion in 54 aneurysms and less than 90% aneurysm occlusion in six aneurysms. Complications occurred in the treatment of 15 aneurysms, including eight procedural ruptures, six thromboembolic events and one case of early hemorrhage. Compared with larger aneurysms, treatment of very small aneurysms was associated with a higher rate of procedural ruptures (7.2% versus 4.4%) and procedural mortality (4.7% versus 2.7%) but a lower procedural morbidity (1.9% versus 4.0%). However none of these differences reached statistical significance (p = 0.186, p= 0.388, respectively). The retreatment rate was higher for the larger aneurysms (8.2% and 6.3%), but this was not significant either (p= 0. 496). At nine-month follow-up significantly more small aneurysms were found to have a stable occlusion grade compared to large aneurysms.Endovascular treatment of very small aneurysms is feasible with a lower retreatment rate compared to large aneurysms (> 3 mm). However the data also suggest that endovascular treatment of very small aneurysms might be associated with an increased risk of procedural ruptures and mortality. At nine-month follow-up results indicate significantly less compaction in the very small aneurysms.
机译:3 mm以下的颅内动脉瘤的血管内治疗被认为是有争议的。这项研究的目的是报告这种动脉瘤盘绕后的血管造影和临床结果,并将其与较大的动脉瘤(> 3 mm)进行比较。在1999年11月至2009年11月之间,尝试了956例连续颅内动脉瘤进行了血管内治疗。在956个动脉瘤中,有111个动脉瘤是非常小的动脉瘤,最大直径不超过3 mm。我们对非常小的动脉瘤盘绕后的血管造影和临床结果进行了回顾性分析,然后将其与较大的动脉瘤的结果进行了比较。最初在8个动脉瘤中均未通过盘绕。在剩余的103个动脉瘤中,完成了血管内治疗,即时血管造影结果显示43个动脉瘤完全闭塞,54个动脉瘤几乎完全闭塞,六个动脉瘤闭塞率不到90%。 15例动脉瘤的治疗过程中出现了并发症,包括8例程序破裂,6例血栓栓塞事件和1例早期出血。与较大的动脉瘤相比,非常小的动脉瘤的治疗具有较高的程序破裂率(7.2%比4.4%)和程序死亡率(4.7%比2.7%),但较低的手术发病率(1.9%比4.0%)。然而,这些差异均未达到统计学显着性(分别为p = 0.186,p = 0.388)。较大的动脉瘤的再治疗率较高(8.2%和6.3%),但这也不显着(p = 0.496)。与大动脉瘤相比,在9个月的随访中,发现小动脉瘤的闭塞程度明显更高。与大动脉瘤(> 3 mm)相比,对小动脉瘤进行血管内治疗是可行的,而且再治疗率更低。然而,数据还表明,很小的动脉瘤的血管内治疗可能会增加手术破裂和死亡的风险。在九个月的随访结果表明,很小的动脉瘤中压实明显减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号