...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India), Series D. Metallurgical & Materials Engineering.Mining Engineering >Comparative Analysis of Abrasive Wear Using Response Surface Method and Artificial Neural Network
【24h】

Comparative Analysis of Abrasive Wear Using Response Surface Method and Artificial Neural Network

机译:基于响应面法和人工神经网络的磨料磨损对比分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This research work deals with the application of response surface methodology and artificial neural network-based mathematical modelling of abrasive wear volume for a dry sliding wear of PTFE pin. The experiments were designed based on central composite design. The disc speed, load and sliding distance have been selected as parameters of the process, while the abrasive wear volume has been selected as an output. The ANNOVA test revealed that the disc speed has maximum influence and contributes 28.21 of abrasive wear volume followed by load, which contributes 12.83 of abrasive wear volume. The two models were compared using root mean square error and absolute standard deviation. The artificial neural network-predicted values of abrasive wear volume were found in close agreement with the actual experimental results as compared to response surface methodology predicted results and hence recommended for the similar studies.
机译:本研究工作涉及响应面方法和基于人工神经网络的磨料磨损量数学建模在PTFE销干滑动磨损中的应用。实验基于中心复合材料设计。圆盘速度、载荷和滑动距离被选为工艺参数,而磨料磨损量被选为输出。ANNOVA测试表明,圆盘速度的影响最大,占磨料磨损量的28.21%,其次是载荷,占磨料磨损量的12.83%。使用均方根误差和绝对标准差对两个模型进行比较。与响应面法预测结果相比,人工神经网络预测的磨料磨损量值与实际实验结果非常吻合,因此推荐用于类似研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号