首页> 外文期刊>International journal of primatology >Behavioral and Endocrine Responses in Male Marmosets to the Establishment of Multimale Breeding Groups: Evidence for Non-monopolizing Facultative Polyandry
【24h】

Behavioral and Endocrine Responses in Male Marmosets to the Establishment of Multimale Breeding Groups: Evidence for Non-monopolizing Facultative Polyandry

机译:行为和内分泌反应在雄性mos猴对多雄繁殖群体的建立:非垄断性兼职一夫一妻制的证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Studies of wild callitrichids provide conflicting evidence regarding polyandrous groups. One perspective supports a monopolizing breeding strategy on the part of one male, while the alternative perspective suggests that polyandry does not lead to a breeding monopoly. We tested the hypotheses in male marmosets (Callithrix kuhlii) with 5 polyandrous groups composed of related/familiar males as our attempts to establish polyandrous groups of unrelated/familiar males failed. We monitored male social and sexual behavior and urinary testosterone (T) and cortisol (CORT) across the first 80 days of group formation and contrasted them with similar measures in males housed in monogamous groups. We also examined the same measures across the females' ovulatory cycles for polyandrous males. We found little evidence that males in polyandrous groups exercised a mating monopoly over the female and no evidence for overt competition between polyandrous males. We found 2 behavioral differences: polyandrous males were less often in proximity and copulated more often with the female than monogamous males did. Our findings suggest that the males in newly-formed groups of marmosets do not monopolize breeding and social behavior with the female. This appears to be the case for 3 reasons. First, males may use sperm competition rather than overt competition. Secondly, it may take longer for relationships to develop between the female and the males in polyandrous groups versus in monogamous groups. Thirdly, the cost of infant care is sufficiently high to demand that group members get along when groups are small and reproductive benefits are shared.
机译:对野生call虫的研究提供了关于一夫多妻制群体的相互矛盾的证据。一种观点支持一个男性的垄断育种策略,而另一种观点则表明,一妻多夫制不会导致育种垄断。由于我们尝试建立不相关/熟悉的雄性的一妻多夫组而失败了,所以我们在由5个由相关/熟悉的雄性组成的一夫多妻组中测试了男性mos猴(Callithrix kuhlii)的假设。我们在成组的前80天内监测了男性的社交和性行为以及尿液中的睾丸激素(T)和皮质醇(CORT),并将其与一夫一妻制群体中的男性进行了对比,并进行了比较。我们还检查了雌雄同体的女性排卵周期中的相同指标。我们发现很少有证据显示一夫多妻制男性对女性实行交配垄断,没有证据表明一夫多妻男性之间存在公开竞争。我们发现了两种行为差异:与一夫一妻制男性相比,一夫多妻制的男性与女性的交往较少,与女性的交往频率更高。我们的研究结果表明,新形成的mar猴组中的雄性不独占雌性的繁殖和社交行为。出现这种情况的原因有3个。首先,男性可以使用精子竞争而不是公开竞争。其次,一夫多妻制与一夫一妻制相比,男性和女性之间建立关系的时间可能更长。第三,婴儿护理的费用足够高,以至于要求小组成员在小组很小且分享生殖利益时相处融洽。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号