首页> 外文期刊>journal of chemical physics >Problems in the comparison of theoretical and experimental hyperpolarizabilities
【24h】

Problems in the comparison of theoretical and experimental hyperpolarizabilities

机译:理论和实验超极化比较中的问题

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Frequently it is useful to compare experimental values of the hyperpolarizabilities bgr; and ggr; with calculated values. It is also often helpful to compare experimental values of bgr; obtained from dc‐electric field induced second harmonic generation (dc‐SHG) experiments, e.g., with values obtained using the solvatochromism method. In order to do this the hyperpolarizabilities must be defined using consistent conventions. In this paper, four commonly used conventions are discussed and simple factors for converting between them presented. In addition, the sum‐over‐states expression for the calculation of bgr; and ggr; is described and its correct use in comparing with hyperpolarizabilities obtained using other experimental and theoretical techniques discussed. As an illustration of the consistent use of conventions,abinitioand semiempirical calculations on para‐nitroaniline are compared with experimental dc‐SHG values. This comparison highlights the difference between theoretical values of the hyperpolarizability with the molecule in a gas phase environment and experimental values obtained in polar solvents−a difference that has in the past been obscured by inconsistent choice of conventions.
机译:通常,将超极化率&bgr;和&ggr;的实验值与计算值进行比较是有用的。比较从dc‐电场诱导二次谐波产生(dc‐SHG)实验中获得的&bgr;实验值通常也很有帮助,例如,与使用溶剂变色法获得的值。为了做到这一点,必须使用一致的约定来定义超极化率。本文讨论了四种常用的约定,并提出了在它们之间转换的简单因素。此外,还描述了用于计算&bgr;和&ggr;的和‐状态表达式,以及它与使用所讨论的其他实验和理论技术获得的超极化率进行比较的正确用法。为了说明一致使用约定,将对连字符硝基苯胺的 abinitio和半经验计算与实验 dc‐SHG 值进行了比较。这种比较突出了分子在气相环境中的超极化率理论值与在极性溶剂中获得的实验值之间的差异 - 这种差异在过去被不一致的约定选择所掩盖。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号