...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research, D. Atmospheres: JGR >Estimation of Soil Evaporation and Vegetation Transpiration Using Two Trapezoidal Models From MODIS Data
【24h】

Estimation of Soil Evaporation and Vegetation Transpiration Using Two Trapezoidal Models From MODIS Data

机译:Estimation of Soil Evaporation and Vegetation Transpiration Using Two Trapezoidal Models From MODIS Data

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Soil evaporation (ETs) and vegetation transpiration (ETv) are essential in evaporative demand analyses and agricultural applications. This study estimated ETs and ETv using two trapezoidal models, that is, the conventional trapezoidal model and the end‐member‐based soil and vegetation energy partitioning (ESVEP) model, at three AmeriFlux tower sites. First, the land surface temperature of a Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) pixel was decomposed into soil and vegetation temperatures (T_s and T_v, respectively) which involve important information related to ETs and ET_v and were compared with corresponding temperatures from the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER). Then ETs and ETv were parameterized, and the total evapotranspiration (ET) was validated with the eddy covariance system measurements after energy imbalance corrections via the residual energy and Bowen ratio methods. The results showed that the ESVEP model partitioned T_s, with a root‐mean‐square error (RMSE) of 1.56-2.70 K (4.98-10.16), and T_v, with an RMSE of 2.54-2.80 K (9.73-11.11), indicating a higher accuracy than that from the conventional trapezoidal model, where the RMSE was 2.26-3.64 K (7.31-13.40) for Ts separation and 2.82-4.62 K (9.80-15.49) for Tv separation. For the ET estimation, the ESVEP model still performed better. The estimation RMSE was 49.8-58.4 W/m~2 (22.8-27.2) for the ESVEP model and 72.0-89.5 W/m~2 (29.8-41.1) for the conventional trapezoidal model, compared to the RE corrected measurements; the RMSE was 42.6-53.3 W/m~2 (24.4-28.1) for the ESVEP model and 57.5-78.1 W/m~2 (32.3-37.9) for the conventional trapezoidal model, compared to the Bowen ratio corrected measurements.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号