...
首页> 外文期刊>artificial organs >Comparison of Rapid In Situ, Regular In Situ, and Ex Vivo Flushing on Hepatic Function
【24h】

Comparison of Rapid In Situ, Regular In Situ, and Ex Vivo Flushing on Hepatic Function

机译:快速原位、常规原位和离体冲洗对肝功能的比较

获取原文

摘要

Abstract:The efficacy of three flushing techniques on subsequent liver function was assessed using the in vivo isolated liver perfusion model (ILPM). Livers from brain‐dead mongrel dogs were flushed with cold Euro‐Collins as follows: Group I, rapid in situ flushing (10 min); Group II, regular in situ flushing (45 min); Group HI, ex vivo flushing (10 min). All livers were then heterotopically transplanted into recipients, using the ILPM, by anastomosis of the portal vein, vena cava, and hepatic artery to the recipient's portal vein, iliac vein, and iliac artery. Reperfusion followed for 30 min. Laboratory samples collected at 0, 5, 15, and 30 min showed that hepatic function was not altered by ex vivo flushing and was only slightly altered by rapid in situ flushing. Regular in situ flushing proved to be damaging to livers. Histological analysis confirmed these findings. Therefore, either rapid in situ or ex vivo flushing can be safely used by the transplant special
机译:摘要:采用体内离体肝灌注模型(ILPM)评估3种冲洗技术对后续肝功能的疗效。脑死亡狗的肝脏用冷 Euro-Collins 冲洗如下:I 组,快速原位冲洗(10 分钟);II组,定期原位冲洗(45分钟);HI 组,离体冲洗(10 分钟)。然后,通过将门静脉、腔静脉和肝动脉吻合到受者的门静脉、髂静脉和髂动脉,将所有肝脏异位移植到受者体内。再灌注 30 分钟。在0、5、15和30 min收集的实验室样本显示,肝功能未因体外冲洗而改变,仅因快速原位冲洗而略有改变。事实证明,定期原位冲洗对肝脏有害。组织学分析证实了这些发现。因此,无论是快速原位冲洗还是离体冲洗,都可以安全地用于移植特殊

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号