首页> 外文期刊>Molecular biology and evolution >Is Genome Complexity a Consequence of Inefficient Selection? Evidence from Intron Creation in Nonrecombining Regions
【24h】

Is Genome Complexity a Consequence of Inefficient Selection? Evidence from Intron Creation in Nonrecombining Regions

机译:基因组复杂性是低效选择的结果吗?来自非重组区域内含子产生的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Genomes show remarkable variation in architecture and complexity across organisms, with large differences in genome size and in numbers of genes, gene duplicates, introns and transposable elements. These differences have important implications for transcriptome and regulatory complexity and ultimately for organismal complexity. Numbers of spliceosomal introns show particularly striking differences, ranging across organisms from zero to hundreds of thousands of introns per genome. The causes of these differences remain poorly understood. According to one influential perspective, differences across species reflect the differential ability of selection in different populations to eliminate allegedly deleterious intron-containing alleles. Direct tests of this theory have been elusive. Here, I study evolution of intron–exon structures in genomic regions of recombination suppression (RRSs), which experience drastically reduced selective efficiency due to hitchhiking and background selection. I studied intron creation in eight independently evolved RRSs, spanning substantial diversity phylogenetically (plants, animals, fungi and brown algae) and biologically (sex chromosomes, mating type chromosomes, genomic regions flanking self-incompatibility loci, and the Drosophila “dot” chromosome). To identify newly created introns in RRSs, I compared intron positions in RRS genes with those in homologous genes. I found very few intron gains: no intron gains were observed in 7/8 studied data sets, and only three intron gains were observed overall (on the Drosophila dot chromosome). These results suggest that efficiency of selection may not be a major cause of differences in intron–exon structures across organisms. Instead, rates of spontaneous intron-creating and intron-deleting mutations may play the central role in shaping intron–exon structures.
机译:基因组在生物体的结构和复杂性上显示出显着差异,基因组大小以及基因、基因重复、内含子和转座元件的数量存在很大差异。这些差异对转录组和调控复杂性以及最终的生物体复杂性具有重要影响。剪接体内含子的数量显示出特别显着的差异,每个基因组从零到数十万个内含子不等。这些差异的原因仍然知之甚少。根据一种有影响力的观点,物种之间的差异反映了不同种群中不同的选择能力,以消除据称有害的含内含子的等位基因。对这一理论的直接检验一直难以捉摸。在这里,我研究了重组抑制基因组区域 (RRS) 中内含子-外显子结构的进化,由于搭便车和背景选择,这些区域的选择效率急剧降低。我研究了八个独立进化的RRS中的内含子产生,这些RRS在系统发育(植物、动物、真菌和褐藻)和生物学(性染色体、交配型染色体、自不亲和位点两侧的基因组区域和果蝇“点”染色体)上具有相当大的多样性。为了识别RRS中新产生的内含子,我将RRS基因中的内含子位置与同源基因中的内含子位置进行了比较。我发现内含子增益很少:在 7/8 研究数据集中没有观察到内含子增益,总体上只观察到三个内含子增益(在果蝇点染色体上)。这些结果表明,选择效率可能不是不同生物体内含子-外显子结构差异的主要原因。相反,自发的内含子产生和内含子删除突变的发生率可能在塑造内含子-外显子结构中起着核心作用。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号