首页> 外文期刊>Indian veterinary medical journal >Comparative efficacy of himax and charmil skin gel therapy in animals
【24h】

Comparative efficacy of himax and charmil skin gel therapy in animals

机译:Himax和Charmil皮肤凝胶疗法在动物中的比较疗效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Skin disorders or dermatoses among animals are of considerable importance due to pathogenic, economic, aesthetic and systemic effects (Blood and Radostitis, 1989). Efficacy of Himax (Tiwari et al., 1998) and Charmil has earlier been reported in a wide range of skin diseases and wounds, surgical and non-surgical (Gahlot et al., 1995; Pradhan 1995; Rajaraman and Appaji Rao, 1995) as well as mange in bovines (Singh and Gill 1993; Latasana et al., 1997) and dogs (Das, 1996; Latasana et al., 1997) etc. In present study a comparative evaluation of Himax an Charmil skin gel against skin disorders in cattle, pig and rabbit over a period of 4 years is being reported.
机译:由于致病,经济,美观和全身性作用,动物之间的皮肤疾病或皮肤病具有相当重要的意义(Blood and Radostitis,1989)。 Himax(Tiwari et al。,1998)和Charmil的功效已被早期报道在广泛的皮肤疾病和伤口中,包括外科手术和非外科手术(Gahlot等,1995; Pradhan 1995; Rajaraman和Appaji Rao,1995)。以及牛(Singh和Gill,1993年; Latasana等,1997年)和狗(Das,1996年; Latasana等,1997年)等中的粪便。在本研究中,Himax和Charmil皮肤凝胶针对皮肤疾病的比较评价。据报道,在牛,猪和兔中使用这种病毒的时间为4年。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号