首页> 外文期刊>European child & adolescent psychiatry >Conduct problems trajectories and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Conduct problems trajectories and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:行为问题轨迹和社会心理结果:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

There is increasing evidence that youth who follow the early onset persistent (EOP), adolescent-onset (AO) and childhood-limited (CL) trajectories of conduct problems show varying patterns of health, mental health, educational, and social outcomes in adulthood. However, there has been no systematic review and meta-analysis on outcomes associated with different conduct problems trajectories. We systematically reviewed the literature of longitudinal studies considering outcomes of three conduct problems trajectories: EOP, AO, and CL compared with individuals with low levels of conduct problems (low). We performed a series of meta-analyses comparing each trajectory to the low group for eight different outcomes in early adulthood or later. Thirteen studies met our inclusion criteria. Outcomes were mental health (depression), cannabis use, alcohol use, self-reported aggression, official records of antisocial behaviour, poor general health, poor education, and poor employment. Overall, EOP individuals showed significant higher risk of poor outcome followed by AO individuals, CL individuals, and finally participants in the low group. All conduct problems trajectories showed higher risk of poor psychosocial outcomes compared to the low group, but the magnitude of risk differed across trajectories, with a general trend for the EOP to perform significantly worse, followed by the AO and CL. Early intervention is recommended across domains to maximise likelihood of desistance from antisocial behaviour and improvement on several psychosocial outcomes.
机译:越来越多的证据表明,遵循早发性持续性 (EOP)、青春期发病 (AO) 和儿童期限制性 (CL) 行为问题轨迹的青少年在成年后表现出不同的健康、心理健康、教育和社会结果模式。然而,目前还没有关于与不同行为问题轨迹相关的结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。我们系统地回顾了纵向研究的文献,这些研究考虑了三种行为问题轨迹的结果:EOP、AO 和 CL 与品行问题水平低(低)的个体相比。我们进行了一系列meta分析,比较了成年早期或以后的八种不同结局的每种轨迹与低组的轨迹。13项研究符合我们的纳入标准。结局是心理健康(抑郁)、大麻使用、酒精使用、自我报告的攻击性、反社会行为的官方记录、总体健康状况不佳、教育程度低和就业率低。总体而言,EOP 个体的不良结局风险显着更高,其次是 AO 个体、CL 个体,最后是低组的参与者。与低组相比,所有品行问题轨迹都显示出较高的不良社会心理结局风险,但风险大小因轨迹而异,EOP 表现明显更差的总体趋势,其次是 AO 和 CL。建议跨领域进行早期干预,以最大限度地提高停止反社会行为的可能性并改善一些社会心理结果。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号