首页> 外文期刊>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery >Control of severe hemorrhage using C-clamp and arterial embolization in hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic ring disruption.
【24h】

Control of severe hemorrhage using C-clamp and arterial embolization in hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic ring disruption.

机译:使用 C 型钳夹和动脉栓塞术控制血流动力学不稳定的盆环破坏患者的严重出血。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Hemorrhage is the leading cause of death in patients with a pelvic fracture. The majority of blood loss derives from injured retroperitoneal veins and broad cancellous bone surfaces. The emergency management of multiply injured patients with pelvic ring disruption and severe hemorrhage remains controversial. Although it is well accepted that the displaced pelvic ring injury must be rapidly reduced and stabilized, the methods by which control of hemorrhagic shock is achieved remain under discussion. It has been proposed to exclusively use external pelvic ring stabilization for control of hemorrhage by producing a 'tamponade effect' of the pelvis. However, the frequency of clinically important arterial bleeding after external fixation of the pelvic ring remains unclear. We therefore undertook this retrospective review to attempt to answer this one important question: How frequently is arterial embolization necessary to control hemorrhage and restore hemodynamic stability after external pelvic ring fixation? MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 55 consecutive patients who presented with unstable types B and C pelvic ring fractures. Those patients designated as being in hemorrhagic shock (defined as a systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg after receiving 2 L of intravenous crystalloid) were treated by application of the pelvic C-clamp. Patients who remained in hemorrhagic shock, or were determined to be in severe shock (defined as mandatory catecholamines or more than 12 blood transfusions over 2 h), underwent therapeutic angiography within 24 h in order to control bleeding. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were identified as being hemodynamically unstable (ISS 30.1 +/- 11.3 points) and were treated with a C-clamp. In those patients with persistent hemodynamic instability, arterial embolization was performed. After C-clamp application, 5 of 14 patients required therapeutic angiography to control bleeding. Two patients died, one from multiple sources of bleeding and the other from an open pelvic fracture (total mortality 2/14, 14). CONCLUSIONS: Although the C-clamp is effective in controlling hemorrhage, one must be aware of the need for arterial embolization to restore hemodynamic stability in a select subgroup of patients.
机译:引言:出血是骨盆骨折患者死亡的主要原因。大部分失血来自腹膜后静脉受伤和宽阔的松质骨表面。盆环破裂和严重出血等多重损伤患者的急诊处理仍存在争议。尽管移位的骨盆环损伤必须迅速减少和稳定,但控制失血性休克的方法仍在讨论中。有人建议专门使用外骨盆环稳定器,通过产生骨盆的“填塞效应”来控制出血。然而,骨盆环外固定后临床重要动脉出血的频率仍不清楚。因此,我们进行了这项回顾性综述,试图回答这个重要问题:骨盆外环固定后,动脉栓塞术控制出血和恢复血流动力学稳定性的频率是多少?材料和方法: 我们对 55 例连续出现不稳定 B 型和 C 型盆环骨折的患者进行了回顾性审查。那些被指定为失血性休克的患者(定义为接受 2 L 静脉晶体液后收缩压低于 90 mmHg)通过应用盆腔 C 型夹进行治疗。仍处于失血性休克或被确定为严重休克(定义为强制性儿茶酚胺或超过 12 次输血超过 2 小时)的患者在 24 小时内接受治疗性血管造影以控制出血。结果:14 例患者被确定为血流动力学不稳定(ISS 30.1 +/- 11.3 分),并接受 C 钳治疗。在那些持续性血流动力学不稳定的患者中,进行动脉栓塞术。C钳应用后,14例患者中有5例需要治疗性血管造影以控制出血。两名患者死亡,一名死于多种出血源,另一名死于开放性骨盆骨折(总死亡率为2/14,14%)。结论:尽管 C 型钳可有效控制出血,但必须意识到动脉栓塞术的必要性,以恢复特定患者亚组的血流动力学稳定性。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号