首页> 外文期刊>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery >Root tear of the meniscus: Biomechanical evaluation of an arthroscopic refixation technique
【24h】

Root tear of the meniscus: Biomechanical evaluation of an arthroscopic refixation technique

机译:半月板根部撕裂:关节镜固定技术的生物力学评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Aim of the current study was to evaluate the structural properties of an arthroscopic refixation technique for meniscal root tears. Hypothesis: Arthroscopic two suture root tear refixation technique using a transtibial approach restores the structural properties of the intact meniscus attachment more closely than a one suture technique. Methods: Lateral root tear refixation was performed in a porcine knee model. Using a material testing machine, structural properties were determined after a cyclic loading protocol comparing transtibial tunnel reconstruction using one or a double suture technique. Intact posterior horn served as control group. Results: Elongation after cyclic testing was significantly lower for intact and two suture technique when compared to single suture technique. Stiffness was significantly higher for intact constructs with a mean of 53.7 (±6.5) N/m and two suture technique with 44.8 (±9.9) N/m when compared to one suture technique with a mean of 37.1 (±5.4) N/m. In elongation and stiffness, no differences were found between intact and two suture technique. Ultimate failure loads were 325.6 (±77) N for the intact, 273.6 (±45.6) N for two suture technique and 149.8 (±24.3) N for the one suture technique. Both reconstruction techniques showed significantly lower ultimate failure load when compared to the intact control. Conclusion: Structural properties of root tear fixation using a transtibial single suture technique showed significantly higher elongation and lower stiffness and failure load after cyclic loading compared to the intact, whereas a two suture technique showed no difference in elongation and stiffness; however, lower failure load.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是评估关节镜固定技术治疗半月板根部撕裂的结构特性。假设:使用经胫骨入路的关节镜双缝根撕裂再固定技术比单缝合技术更接近地恢复完整半月板附着的结构特性。方法:在猪膝模型中进行侧根撕裂再固定术。使用材料试验机,在循环加载协议后确定结构特性,比较使用单缝合或双缝合技术的经胫隧道重建。完整的后角作为对照组。结果:与单缝合技术相比,完整缝合和双缝合技术在循环测试后的伸长率显着降低。与平均值为 37.1 (±5.4) N/m 的一种缝合技术相比,完整结构的刚度显着更高,平均值为 53.7 (±6.5) N/m,两次缝合技术为 44.8 (±9.9) N/m。在伸长率和刚度方面,完整缝合技术与双缝合技术之间没有差异。完好无损的极限破坏载荷为 325.6 (±77) N,两次缝合技术的极限破坏载荷为 273.6 (±45.6) N,一次缝合技术的极限破坏载荷为 149.8 (±24.3) N。与完整对照组相比,两种重建技术都显示出显着降低的极限破坏载荷。结论:与完整加样相比,经胫骨单缝合技术的根撕裂固定结构特性在循环荷载后伸长率显著升高,刚度和破坏荷载较低,而双缝合技术在伸长率和刚度上没有差异;但是,故障负载较低。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号