...
首页> 外文期刊>Bioelectromagnetics: Journal of the Bioelectromagnetics Society >Comment concerning 'Do electromagnetic fields interact with electrons in Na,K-ATPase?' (Bioelectromagnetics 26:677-683 (2005)).
【24h】

Comment concerning 'Do electromagnetic fields interact with electrons in Na,K-ATPase?' (Bioelectromagnetics 26:677-683 (2005)).

机译:关于“电磁场与Na,K-ATP酶中的电子相互作用吗?(生物电磁学 26:677-683 (2005))。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Blank 2005 attempts to reconcile some of his previous experimental results, which he reports show effects of weak ELF electromagnetic fields on Na,K-ATPase activity, "with current ideas in biology." His argument, however, has fatal and very obvious weaknesses. The first is the validity of his original assumptions. Blank postulates that electrons exist "with picosecond lifetimes moving at great velocities" in membranes and proteins. In justification he cites Fecko et al. 2003 on "flickering in H-bonded networks which indicate that protons regularly move between oxygens." Apart from the obvious nonsequitur in this line of reasoning, the study that he cites is about a totally unrelated subject, fluctuations in the hydrogen bond network in liquid water. The dynamics of electrons in matter is a complex subject, and it will not do to conjure up a theory based on a misreading of a study on an unrelated subject.
机译:Blank [2005]试图调和他以前的一些实验结果,他报告说,这些结果显示了弱ELF电磁场对Na,K-ATP酶活性的影响,“与生物学中目前的想法”。然而,他的论点有致命且非常明显的弱点。首先是他最初假设的有效性。布兰克假设电子存在于膜和蛋白质中“以皮秒级的寿命以极快的速度移动”。为了证明这一点,他引用了 Fecko 等人 [2003] 关于“氢键网络中的闪烁,这表明质子有规律地在氧之间移动”。除了这种推理方式中明显的非对等性之外,他引用的研究是关于一个完全不相关的主题,即液态水中氢键网络的波动。物质中电子的动力学是一个复杂的主题,根据对一个不相关主题的研究的误读而想出一个理论是行不通的。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号