首页> 外文期刊>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. >Does discoid lateral meniscus have inborn peripheral rim instability? Comparison between intact discoid lateral meniscus and normal lateral meniscus
【24h】

Does discoid lateral meniscus have inborn peripheral rim instability? Comparison between intact discoid lateral meniscus and normal lateral meniscus

机译:盘状外侧半月板是否具有先天性外周边缘不稳定?完整盘状外侧半月板与正常外侧半月板的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Introduction Little is known about peripheral rim instability (PRI) of adult discoid lateral meniscus (DLM). We compared PRI of the intact DLM (iDLM) to those of intact normal lateral meniscus (LM) in adult patients and also investigated whether there was any association between PRI and DLM tears.Materials and methods We investigated PRI in 17 DLMs and 60 normal LMs without tears during arthroscopic surgery for medial compartmental pathologies between June 2012 and October 2015. We also investigate PRI of torn DLM (tDLM) excluding peripheral tear to compare the PRI between intact and torn DLM. Stability parameters were measured using a probing hook and arthroscopic ruler at the anterior, middle, and posterior parts of the peripheral rim of the menisci: translating the anterior horn (AH) and mid-body (MB) and lifting the posterior horn (PH).ResuIts AH and PH instabilities were greater in the iDLM group than in the iLM group (2.2 ± 1.4 vs. 0.9 ± 1.4 mm, p = 0.006 and 3.4 ±1.7 vs. 1.7 ±1.2 mm, p = 0.004, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in MB instability between two groups. In addition, no significant difference was observed in all the parameters between the iDLM and tDLM groups.Conclusion Both iDLM and tDLM had greater PRI of the AH and PH than the iLM in adult patients. Thus, the DLM is prone to tear and careful inspection is needed not to overlook PRI of a DLM even if the peripheral attachment is intact. Level of evidence Level 3, comparative study of anatomical instability of living subjects.
机译:简介 对成年盘状外侧半月板 (DLM) 的外周边缘不稳定性 (PRI) 知之甚少。我们比较了成年患者完整DLM(iDLM)的PRI与完整正常外侧半月板(LM)的PRI,并研究了PRI与DLM撕裂之间是否存在任何关联。材料和方法 我们研究了 2012 年 6 月至 2015 年 10 月期间 17 例 DLM 和 60 例正常 LM 在关节镜手术期间内侧室病变的 PRI 情况。我们还研究了撕裂的 DLM (tDLM) 的 PRI,不包括外周撕裂,以比较完整和撕裂的 DLM 之间的 PRI。在半月板外缘的前部、中部和后部使用探查钩和关节镜尺测量稳定性参数:平移前角 (AH) 和中体 (MB) 并抬起后角 (PH)。iDLM组的ResuIts AH和PH不稳定度高于iLM组(2.2±1.4 vs. 0.9 ± 1.4 mm,p = 0.006和3.4±1.7 vs. 1.7±分别为1.2 mm,p = 0.004)。然而,两组间MB不稳定性无显著差异。此外,iDLM组和tDLM组之间的所有参数均未观察到显著差异。结论 iDLM和tDLM对AH和PH的PRI均高于iLM。因此,DLM 容易撕裂,即使外围附件完好无损,也需要仔细检查不要忽视 DLM 的 PRI。证据水平 3 级,活体受试者解剖学不稳定性的比较研究。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号