首页> 外文期刊>Biopharmaceutics and Drug Disposition >Bioequivalency of oral suspension formulations of cefixine
【24h】

Bioequivalency of oral suspension formulations of cefixine

机译:头孢西平口服混悬液制剂的生物等效性

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

AbstractA study was performed in 24 healthy male subjects to establish that two suspension formulations of cefixime were bioequivalent to each other and to a reference oral solution. A single 400mg oral dose of the drug was given in a randomized three‐way crossover design as two suspensions (a research suspension (RS) used during clinical trials and a suspension intended for marketing (MS)) and a reference oral solution (SOL). Each dose was separated from the other by a 3‐day washout period. Mean peak serum concentrations (Cmax) were 4·67, 4·10, and 4·27 μg ml−1after the MS, RS, and SOL, respectively. Although comparison (ANOVA) of the mean pharmacokinetic parameters for cefixime found significant differences (p0·05) were found in either the elimination half‐life or renal clearance of unchanged drug. Overall, with a 98 per cent power to detect a 20 per cent difference in AUC0→∞or urinary recovery values between the formulations tested, the results show that the MS was bioequivalent to the RS and that both suspensions were bioeq
机译:摘要一项对24名健康男性受试者进行的研究,以确定两种头孢克肟混悬制剂彼此具有生物等效性,并且与参考口服溶液具有生物等效性。单次口服剂量为400mg的药物,采用随机三向交叉设计,分为两种悬浮液(临床试验期间使用的研究悬浮液(RS)和用于销售的悬浮液(MS))和参比口服溶液(SOL)。每个剂量与另一个剂量间隔 3 天的清除期。MS、RS 和 SOL 后的平均血清峰值浓度 (Cmax) 分别为 4·67、4·10 和 4·27 μg ml−1。尽管对头孢克肟的平均药代动力学参数进行比较(ANOVA)发现,三种制剂之间的Cmax、toCmax时间和血清浓度时间曲线下面积(AUC0∞)值存在显著差异(p0·05)。总体而言,在98%的功效下,检测两种制剂之间的AUC0→∞或尿液恢复值差异为20%,结果表明MS与RS具有生物等效性,并且两种悬浮液都是生物当量

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号