AbstractA three‐way crossover study was performed to compare the bioavailability of a new pelletised doxycycline product administered either with food or without food and a reference product taken without food.Four different methods were used to calculate pharmacokinetic parameters from the data. The sums of squares, Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC), and the ranges for the parameters obtained were used for comparison. Good fits to the data were obtained when all four methods were used, each with a lag time. The two compartment open model was the most efficient method for describing the data. The one compartment open model was the least efficient, particularly with respect to predicting the peak concentration of doxycycline in plasma. All the models gave similar rank order results with respect to bioavailability differences between the three treatments.Analysis of the data by different methods suggests that pelletised doxycycline is bioequivalent to the reference product when taken in the absence of food. A standardized feeding regimen affected the rate, but not extent of absorption of doxycycline from the pelletised formulatio
展开▼
