首页> 外文期刊>Weed technology: A journal of the Weed Science Society of America >Timing of Soil-Residual Herbicide Applications for Control of Giant Ragweed(Ambrosia trifida)
【24h】

Timing of Soil-Residual Herbicide Applications for Control of Giant Ragweed(Ambrosia trifida)

机译:土壤残留除草剂防治巨型豚草(Ambrosia trifida)的施用时机

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Fall-applied residual and spring preplant burn-down herbicide applications are typically used to control winter annual weeds and may also provide early-season residual control of summer annual weed species such as giant ragweed. Field experiments wereconducted from 2006 to 2008 in southern Illinois to (1) assess the emergence pattern of giant ragweed, (2) evaluate the efficacy of several herbicides commonly used for soil-residual control of giant ragweed, and (3) investigate the optimal applicationtiming of soil-residual herbicides for control of giant ragweed. Six herbicide treatments were applied at four application timings: early fall, late fall, early spring, and late spring. Giant ragweed first emerged in mid- and late-March in 2007 and 2008,respectively. The duration of emergence varied by year, with 95 of emergence complete in late May of 2008, but not until early July in 2007. Giant ragweed emergence occurred more quickly in plots that received a fall application of glyphosate + 2,4-Dcompared with the nontreated. Fall-applied residual herbicides did not reduce giant ragweed emergence in 2007 when compared with the nontreated, with the exception of chlorimuron + tribenuron applied in late fall. Giant ragweed control from early- and late-spring herbicide applications was variable by year. In 2007, saflufenacil (50 and 100 g ai ha~(-1)(-1)) and simazine applied in early spring reduced giant ragweed densities by 95 or greater through mid-May; however, in 2008, early-spring applications failed to reduce giant ragweed emergence in mid-April. The only treatments that reduced giant ragweed densities by > 80 through early July were late-spring applications of chlorimuron + tribenuron or saflufenacil at 100 g ha- . Thus, the emergence patterns of giant ragweed in southern Illinois dictates that best management with herbicides would include late-spring applications of soil-residual herbicides just before crop planting and most likely requires subsequent control wirh foliar or soil-residual herbicides after crop emergence.
机译:秋季施用的残留除草剂和春季播种前燃尽除草剂通常用于控制冬季一年生杂草,也可以为夏季一年生杂草物种(如巨型豚草)提供早季残留控制。2006-2008年在伊利诺伊州南部进行了田间试验,以(1)评估巨型豚草的出苗模式,(2)评估几种常用于巨型豚草土壤残留控制的除草剂的功效,以及(3)研究土壤残留除草剂控制巨型豚草的最佳施用时机。在初秋、晚秋、早春和晚春四个施用时间施用六种除草剂。巨型豚草分别于2007年和2008年3月中下旬首次出现。出苗时间因年份而异,95%的出苗在2008年5月下旬完成,但直到2007年7月初才完成。与未处理的相比,在接受草甘膦+2,4-D秋季施用的地块中,巨型豚草的出现速度更快。与未处理的除草剂相比,秋季施用的残留除草剂在2007年并没有减少巨型豚草的出现,但晚秋施用的氯嘧啶+三苯脲除外。早春和晚春施用除草剂对巨型豚草的控制因年份而异。2007年,早春施用沙氟非那嘧啶(50和100 g ai ha~(-1)(-1))和西玛津,到5月中旬,巨型豚草密度降低了95%或更多;然而,在2008年,早春的施用未能减少4月中旬巨型豚草的出现。到7月初,唯一将巨型豚草密度降低>80%的处理方法是在春末施用100克公顷的氯嘧隆+三苯磺隆或沙氟苯那嘧啶。因此,伊利诺伊州南部巨型豚草的出现模式决定了除草剂的最佳管理将包括在作物种植前的晚春施用土壤残留除草剂,并且很可能需要在作物出苗后使用叶面或土壤残留除草剂进行后续控制。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号