首页> 外文期刊>International journal of legal medicine >The accuracy of 3D virtual bone models of the pelvis for morphological sex estimation
【24h】

The accuracy of 3D virtual bone models of the pelvis for morphological sex estimation

机译:骨盆3D虚拟骨骼模型在形态性别估计中的准确性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

It is currently unknown whether morphological sex estimation traits are accurately portrayed on virtual bone models, and this hampers the use of virtual bone models as an alternative source of contemporary skeletal reference data. This study determines whether commonly used morphological sex estimation traits can be accurately scored on virtual 3D pelvic bone elements. Twenty-seven intact cadavers from the body donation program of the Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, were CT scanned; this data was used to produce virtual bone models. Thereafter, the dry bones were obtained. Three traits by Klales (2012) and five traits from the Workshop of European Anthropologists (WEA) (1980) were scored on the virtual bone models and their dry skeletal counterparts. Intra- and inter-observer agreement and the agreement between the scores for each virtual bone model-dry bone pair were calculated using weighted Cohen's kappa (K). For all Klales (2012) traits, intra- and inter-observer agreement was substantial to almost perfect for the virtual- and dry bones (K = 0.62-0.90). The agreement in scores in the virtual-dry bone pairs ranged from moderate to almost perfect (K = 0.58-0.82). For the WEA (1980) traits, intra-observer agreement was substantial to almost perfect (K = 0.64-0.91), but results were less unambiguous for inter-observer agreement (K = 0.24-0.88). Comparison of the scores between the virtual bone models and the dry bones yielded kappa values of 0.42-0.87. On one hand, clinical CT data is a promising source for contemporary forensic anthropological reference data, but the interchangeability of forensic anthropological methods between virtual bone models and dry skeletal elements needs to be tested further.
机译:目前尚不清楚形态学性别估计特征是否在虚拟骨骼模型上准确描绘,这阻碍了虚拟骨骼模型作为当代骨骼参考数据的替代来源的使用。本研究确定了常用的形态性别估计性状是否可以在虚拟 3D 骨盆骨元素上准确评分。对来自阿姆斯特丹大学阿姆斯特丹UMC遗体捐赠计划的27具完整尸体进行了CT扫描;这些数据用于生成虚拟骨骼模型。此后,获得了干骨。Klales(2012)的三个特征和欧洲人类学家研讨会(WEA)(1980)的五个特征在虚拟骨骼模型及其干骨模型上进行了评分。使用加权 Cohen kappa (K) 计算观察者内部和观察者间的一致性以及每个虚拟骨模型-干骨对的分数之间的一致性。对于Klales(2012)的所有特征,观察者内部和观察者之间的一致性对于虚拟骨骼和干骨骼(K = 0.62-0.90)几乎是完美的。虚拟干骨对的分数一致性从中等到几乎完美不等(K = 0.58-0.82)。对于WEA(1980)性状,观察者内部的一致性是实质性的,几乎是完美的(K = 0.64-0.91),但观察者间一致性的结果不那么明确(K = 0.24-0.88)。比较虚拟骨骼模型和干骨骼之间的分数,得出 kappa 值为 0.42-0.87。一方面,临床CT数据是当代法医人类学参考数据的一个有前途的来源,但法医人类学方法在虚拟骨骼模型和干骨骼元素之间的互换性需要进一步测试。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号