首页> 外文期刊>Lymphatic research and biology. >Comparison of Two Methods, the Sponge Method and Young's Modulus, for Evaluating Stiffness of Skin or Subcutaneous Tissues in the Extremities of Patients with Lymphedema: A Pilot Study
【24h】

Comparison of Two Methods, the Sponge Method and Young's Modulus, for Evaluating Stiffness of Skin or Subcutaneous Tissues in the Extremities of Patients with Lymphedema: A Pilot Study

机译:海绵法和杨氏模量两种方法评估淋巴水肿患者四肢皮肤或皮下组织僵硬度的比较:一项初步研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare two methods, the sponge method and SOFTMEASURE, to evaluate the stiffness in lymphedema extremities. We investigated 12 lower extremities of six patients with lymphedema using the methods and compared the results with International Society of Lymphedema classification and lymphoscintigraphic staging. The average age was 53.8 years (43-70 years). We prepared three sponges with different hardness, each of them was numbered as 2, 4, or 6, for the sponge method. We compared the stiffness of the lymphedema extremities and recorded the number of the sponge that was most comparable in stiffness. SOFTMEASURE is a portable device used to measure Young's modulus of an object. Measurement was performed thrice for each extremity. We excluded the most extreme value and the average of the other two values was used for evaluation. The correlation coefficient between SOFTMEASURE and the International Society of Lymphology (ISL) stage was 0.79, and between SOFTMEASURE and the lymphoscintigraphic stage was 0.85 (indentation force of 0.5N). The correlation coefficient between the sponge method and the ISL stage was 0.57, and between the sponge method and the lymphoscintigraphic stage was 0.54, which indicated an intermediate correlation. In conclusion, evaluation of the stiffness of the skin or subcutaneous tissue in the lymphedema extremities using SOFTMEASURE or the sponge method to assess lymphedema severity was easy and minimally invasive. Sponge method seemed to be more useful than SOFTMEASURE because it had higher correlation with the ISL staging and lymphoscintigraphic staging. Recognizing the change in stiffness is important for determining the therapeutic strategy of lymphedema.
机译:本研究的目的是比较海绵法和 SOFTMEASURE 两种方法,以评估四肢淋巴水肿的僵硬度。我们使用这些方法调查了 6 名淋巴水肿患者的 12 名下肢,并将结果与国际淋巴水肿学会分类和淋巴闪烁显像分期进行了比较。平均年龄为53.8岁(43-70岁)。我们准备了三种不同硬度的海绵,每块海绵的编号分别为 2、4 或 6,用于海绵法。我们比较了四肢淋巴水肿的僵硬度,并记录了刚度最相似的海绵数量。SOFTMEASURE是一种便携式设备,用于测量物体的杨氏模量。对每个肢体进行三次测量。我们排除了最极端的值,并使用其他两个值的平均值进行评估。SOFTMEASURE与国际淋巴学会(International Society of Lymphology,ISL)分期的相关系数为0.79,SOFTMEASURE与淋巴闪烁显像分期的相关系数为0.85(压痕力为0.5N)。海绵法与ISL分期的相关系数为0.57,海绵法与淋巴闪烁显像分期的相关系数为0.54,表明存在中等相关性。总之,使用SOFTMEASURE或海绵法评估淋巴水肿严重程度的淋巴水肿四肢皮肤或皮下组织的硬度是简单且微创的。海绵法似乎比 SOFTMEASURE 更有用,因为它与 ISL 分期和淋巴闪烁显像分期具有更高的相关性。识别僵硬的变化对于确定淋巴水肿的治疗策略很重要。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号