【24h】

Single-stream recycling: Assessing the trade-offs

机译:单流回收:评估权衡取舍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Opinions differ. Single-stream recycling collection and processing is either the demise of recycling or its salvation for the future. As with most things, neither of these extremes is completely true - and as in most things in solid waste management, no one best system suits every location. While many assert that single-stream service leads to increases in recycling tonnage, improve collection efficiency and save on collection cost, others argue that single-stream programs lead to: 1.Increases in processing costs; 2. Increases in contamination to levels unacceptable to end users; 3. Negative market impacts (costs and load rejections). Each of the aforementioned criticisms ring true in some communities; however, decision-making should be based on reliable analyses rather than merely on individual case studies. Program decision-making needs verifiable results, input on the relative sizes of the various impacts and the trade-offs on tons, costs and cost-effectiveness associated with single-stream - and careful analysis is needed to examine these issues.
机译:众说纷纭。单流回收收集和处理要么是回收的消亡,要么是对未来的救赎。与大多数事情一样,这两个极端都不是完全正确的——就像固体废物管理中的大多数事情一样,没有一个最好的系统适合每个地方。虽然许多人断言单流服务可以增加回收吨位,提高收集效率并节省收集成本,但其他人则认为单流计划会导致:1.处理成本增加;2. 污染增加到最终用户无法接受的水平;3. 负面市场影响(成本和负载废止)。上述每一项批评在某些社区都是正确的;然而,决策应基于可靠的分析,而不仅仅是个别案例研究。计划决策需要可验证的结果,对各种影响的相对规模以及与单流相关的吨数、成本和成本效益的权衡提供投入,并且需要仔细分析以审查这些问题。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号