...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and experimental allergy : >Allergy to guinea pigs: I Allergenic activities of extracts derived from the pelt, saliva, urine and other sources
【24h】

Allergy to guinea pigs: I Allergenic activities of extracts derived from the pelt, saliva, urine and other sources

机译:对豚鼠过敏:I 从毛皮,唾液,尿液和其他来源提取的提取物的过敏活性

获取原文

摘要

SummaryGuinea pig‐sensitive patients with asthma and rhinitis were skin test positive to extracts of several materials derived from guinea pigs. A radioallergosorbent test (RAST) was developed to measure serum IgE specific for the dander, urine, saliva and also for dust from the air‐vent filters of a room housing guinea pigs. A strong correlation was found between positive skin test reactions, and raised serum IgE to these extracts. Furthermore, the relative allergenic potency of extracts was similar when determined by skin‐prick testing and by inhibition of the RAST to guinea pig dust.Non‐guinea pig‐derived extracts such as the hay, sawdust and diet had negligible activity in skin testing and RAST inhibition; and preparations ofDermatophagoides pteronyssinus, house dust and rat dust did not inhibit the RAST for guinea pig room dust.The guinea pig dust, dander, fur, urine and saliva were the more potent extracts; while whole pelt, faces and serum were considerably less active. Extracts from different sexes were not appreciably different in potency.The results of skin testing. RAST and RAST inhibition suggest cross‐allergenicity between the various extracts. Although material shed from the pelt may have been derived from saliva, or even urine, allergenic activities of urinary and salivary preparations were found to be less than those of the dander, fur or dust. This suggests that allergens have become concentrated
机译:摘要豚鼠敏感哮喘和鼻炎患者对来自豚鼠的几种材料的提取物的皮肤试验呈阳性。开发了一种放射性过敏原吸附试验 (RAST),用于测量针对皮屑、尿液、唾液以及豚鼠饲养室通风过滤器的灰尘的血清 IgE。发现阳性皮肤试验反应与血清 IgE 升高与这些提取物之间存在很强的相关性。此外,当通过皮肤点刺试验和抑制RAST对豚鼠粉尘确定时,提取物的相对致敏效力是相似的。非豚鼠来源的提取物,如干草、锯末和饲料,在皮肤试验和RAST抑制方面的活性可以忽略不计;而Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus、屋尘和鼠尘的制剂对豚鼠房粉尘的RAST没有抑制作用。豚鼠粉、皮屑、毛皮、尿液和唾液是更有效的提取物;而整张毛皮、面部和血清的活性要低得多。不同性别的提取物在效力上没有明显差异。皮肤测试的结果。RAST 和 RAST 抑制表明各种提取物之间存在交叉过敏性。虽然从毛皮上脱落的物质可能来自唾液甚至尿液,但发现尿液和唾液制剂的过敏活性低于皮屑、毛皮或灰尘的过敏活性。这表明过敏原已经浓缩

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号