...
首页> 外文期刊>Current diabetes reviews >Quantitative Evaluation of Diabetic Medical Record Documentation
【24h】

Quantitative Evaluation of Diabetic Medical Record Documentation

机译:糖尿病病历文件的定量评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: The documentation of medical records of diabetic patients is very importantfor the treatment of diabetes. The purpose of this study was to conduct quantitative evaluations of theDiabetic Medical Record (DMR) and Documentation Completeness Rate (DCR).Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated the DCR of DMRs in the Comprehensive DiabetesCenter of Imam Reza Hospital (CDRIRH). A checklist was prepared to evaluate the DCR. The overallassessment of the DCR was represented according to the following rating: 95–100 as strong, 75–94as moderate, and less than 75 as weak. The free texts that physicians recorded in the DMRs were extractedto identify the data elements that physicians must record. In addition, the clinical importance ofthe data elements of the DMRs from the perspective of the endocrinologists was determined and thencompared with the DCR.Results: In this study, 1,200 DMRs and DCRs for 50 data elements in eight major categories wereevaluated. The total DCR average was 30 and data elements in the laboratory test results categorydemonstrated the highest DCR (50.5), whereas the least percentage was demonstrated in the internalvisits category. The DCR for the other main categories was: demographic information = 48.5; patientreferral information = 14.2; diagnosis = 5; anti-hyperglycemic medications = 25.5; diabetic complications= 17.7; and results of specialty and subspecialty consultation = 41.7. The evaluation ofthe free text data element in the DMRs indicated that physicians documented free text data elements inthree categories.Conclusion: Our results demonstrated a weak level of documentation in the DMRs. The physicians hadwritten many data elements in the margins of the DMRs. Therefore, it indicates the necessity to modifyand change the structure of the DMR.
机译:背景:糖尿病患者的病历记录对于糖尿病的治疗非常重要。本研究的目的是对糖尿病病历 (DMR) 和文件完整性 (DCR) 进行定量评估。方法:在这项回顾性研究中,我们评估了伊玛目礼萨医院综合糖尿病中心 (CDRIRH) DMR 的 DCR。编制了一份清单来评估 DCR。对 DCR 的总体评估根据以下评级表示:95-100% 为强,75-94% 为中等,低于 75% 为弱。提取医生在 DMR 中记录的自由文本,以识别医生必须记录的数据元素。此外,从内分泌学家的角度确定了DMR数据元素的临床重要性,然后与DCR进行了比较。结果:本研究评估了8大类50个数据元素的1,200个DMR和DCR。总 DCR 平均值为 30%,实验室测试结果类别中的数据元素表现出最高的 DCR (50.5%),而在内部访问类别中表现出的百分比最小。其他主要类别的DCR为:人口统计信息=48.5%;患者转诊信息 = 14.2%;诊断 = 5%;抗高血糖药物 = 25.5%;糖尿病并发症= 17.7%;专科和亚专科会诊结果 = 41.7%。对DMR中自由文本数据元素的评估表明,医生将自由文本数据元素分为三类。结论:我们的结果表明DMRs的文档水平较弱。医生们在DMR的空白处写了许多数据元素。因此,它表明有必要修改和改变 DMR 的结构。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号