首页> 外文期刊>IEICE Transactions on fundamentals of electronics, communications & computer sciences >Numerical Performances of Recursive Least Squares and Predictor Based Least Squares: A Comparative Study
【24h】

Numerical Performances of Recursive Least Squares and Predictor Based Least Squares: A Comparative Study

机译:递归最小二乘法和基于预测变量的最小二乘法的数值性能:比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The numerical properties of the recursive least squares (RLS) algorithm and its fast versions have been extensively studied. However, very few investigations are reported concerning the numerical behavior of the predictor based least squares (PLS) algorithms that provide the same least squares solutions as the RLS algorithm. This paper presents a comparative study on the numerical performances of the RLS and the backward PLS (BPLS) algorithms. Theoretical analysis of three main instability sources reported in the literature, including the over-range of the conversion factor, the loss of symmetry and the loss of positive definiteness of the inverse correlation matrix, has been done under a finite-precision arithmetic. Simulation results have confirmed the validity of our analysis. The results show that three main instability sources encountered in the RLS algorithm do not exist in the BPLS algorithm. Consequently, the BPLS algorithm provides a much more stable and robust numerical performance compared with the RLS algorithm.
机译:递归最小二乘法(RLS)算法及其快速版本的数值性质得到了广泛的研究。然而,很少有关于基于预测变量的最小二乘法 (PLS) 算法的数值行为的研究,该算法提供与 RLS 算法相同的最小二乘解。本文对RLS和后向PLS(BPLS)算法的数值性能进行了比较研究。文献中报道的三个主要不稳定源,包括转换因子的超范围、对称性丧失和逆相关矩阵的正确定性丧失,都是在有限精度算术下进行的。仿真结果验证了我们分析的有效性。结果表明,RLS算法中遇到的3个主要不稳定源在BPLS算法中并不存在。因此,与RLS算法相比,BPLS算法提供了更稳定和鲁棒的数值性能。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号