首页> 外文期刊>Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research >Comparison of postoperative pain and satisfaction after dacryocystorhinostomy in patients operated on under local and general anesthesia
【24h】

Comparison of postoperative pain and satisfaction after dacryocystorhinostomy in patients operated on under local and general anesthesia

机译:局部和全身麻醉下手术的患者泪囊鼻造口术后疼痛和满意度的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: There has been only 1 study on postoperative pain after external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) that compared pain between 2 groups of patients; 1 group received local anesthesia and the other received general anesthesia. To further characterize the relationship between these 2 types of anesthesia and postoperative pain, we designed a study in which a single patient received these 2 different anesthesia modalities for a short interval on 2 different sides. Material/Methods: There were 50 participants in this study. External DCR was performed on the same participant on both sides using local anesthesia on 1 side and general anesthesia on the other. Postoperative pain was measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS), and localization and timing of pain were reported by the participants. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were documented if present. Results: Pain levels were significantly higher with general anesthesia 3 hours post-surgery, and 6 hours post-surgery the pain remains higher following general anesthesia but is borderline insignificant (p=0.051). However, 12 hours post-surgery, there is no significant difference in the pain level (p=0.240). There was no significant difference in the localization of pain with local and general anesthesia. Postoperative nausea is significantly more frequent after general anesthesia, and vomiting only occurs with general anesthesia. Local anesthesia was preferred by 94 of the participants (47 out of 50). Conclusions: The vast majority of patients in our study who have undergone both GA and LA DCR would choose LA again, providing a compelling case for use of the LA technique.
机译:背景:只有 1 项关于外泪囊鼻腔造瘘术 (DCR) 术后疼痛的研究比较了 2 组患者之间的疼痛;1组接受局部麻醉,另一组接受全身麻醉。为了进一步表征这两种麻醉与术后疼痛之间的关系,我们设计了一项研究,其中一名患者在 2 个不同侧的短时间内接受这两种不同的麻醉方式。材料/方法:本研究有 50 名参与者。对双方的同一参与者进行外部 DCR,一侧使用局部麻醉,另一侧使用全身麻醉。使用视觉模拟量表 (VAS) 测量术后疼痛,参与者报告疼痛的定位和时间。如果存在术后恶心和呕吐 (PONV),则记录在案。结果:术后 3 小时全身麻醉时疼痛水平明显升高,术后 6 小时全身麻醉后疼痛水平仍然较高,但临界无意义 (p=0.051)。然而,术后 12 小时,疼痛程度无显著差异 (p=0.240)。局部麻醉和全身麻醉在疼痛的定位方面没有显着差异。全身麻醉后术后恶心明显更频繁,呕吐仅在全身麻醉时发生。94% 的参与者(50 人中有 47 人)更喜欢局部麻醉。结论:在我们的研究中,绝大多数接受过 GA 和 LA DCR 的患者会再次选择 LA,这为使用 LA 技术提供了令人信服的案例。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号