首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of Units Dedicated to Acute Coronary Syndromes
【24h】

Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of Units Dedicated to Acute Coronary Syndromes

机译:急性冠脉综合征专科单位经济评价的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Dedicated units for the care of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have been submitted to economic evaluations; however, the results have not been systematically presented. Objective: To identify and summarize economic outcomes of studies on hospital units dedicated to the initial care of patients with suspected or confirmed ACS. Methods: A systematic review of literature to identify economic evaluations of chest pain unit (CPU), coronary care unit (CCU), or equivalent units was done. Two search strategies were used: the first one to identify economic evaluations irrespective of study design, and the second one to identify randomized clinical trials that reported economic outcomes. The following databases were searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and National Health Service (NHS) Economic Evaluation Database. Data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. Costs were inflated to 2012 values. Results: Search strategies retrieved five partial economic evaluations based on observational studies, six randomized clinical trials that reported economic outcomes, and five model-based economic evaluations. Overall, cost estimates based on observational studies and randomized clinical trials reported statistically significant cost savings of more than 50 with the adoption of CPU care instead of routine hospitalization or CCU care for suspected low-to-intermediate risk patients with ACS (median per-patient cost US $1,969.89; range US $1,002.12-13,799.15). Model-based economic evaluations reported incremental cost-effectiveness ratios below US $50,000/quality-adjusted life year for all comparisons between intermediate care unit, CPU, or CCU with routine hospital admissions. This finding was sensible to myocardial infarction probability. Conclusions: Published economic evaluations indicate that more intensive care is likely to be cost-effective in comparison to routine hospital admission for patients with suspected ACS.
机译:背景:急性冠脉综合征(ACS)的专门护理单位已提交经济评估;然而,结果尚未系统地呈现。目的:确定和总结专门用于疑似或确诊ACS患者初始护理的医院单位研究的经济结果。方法:对文献进行系统回顾,以确定胸痛病房(CPU)、冠状动脉监护病房(CCU)或同等单位的经济评价。使用了两种检索策略:第一种是确定经济评价,而与研究设计无关,第二种是确定报告经济结局的随机临床试验。检索了以下数据库:MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL和国家卫生服务(NHS)经济评估数据库。资料提取由两名独立评价员进行。成本被夸大到2012年的价值。结果:检索策略检索了5项基于观察性研究的部分经济评价、6项报告经济结局的随机临床试验和5项基于模型的经济评价。总体而言,基于观察性研究和随机临床试验的成本估算报告称,对于疑似中低风险ACS患者,采用CPU治疗而不是常规住院或CCU治疗,在统计学上显着节省了50%以上的成本(每位患者的中位数成本为1,969.89美元;范围为1,002.12-13,799.15美元)。基于模型的经济评估报告称,中级护理病房、CPU 或 CCU 与常规住院之间的所有比较都低于 50,000 美元/质量调整生命年。这一发现对心肌梗死概率是敏感的。结论:已发表的经济评估表明,对于疑似ACS患者,与常规住院相比,更多的重症监护可能具有成本效益。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号