首页> 外文期刊>world future review >Is the Recovery of Failing Scenario Analysis a Legitimate and Valuable Activity?
【24h】

Is the Recovery of Failing Scenario Analysis a Legitimate and Valuable Activity?

机译:恢复失败的情景分析是否是一项合法且有价值的活动?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

There is a rich academic literature about scenario planning expressing concerns with improving the effectiveness of scenario analysis as a process and with scenario methods being misused. Controlling for process execution and reacting to unforeseen events to avoid downside risks is the domain of operational control. Mechanisms for operational control are normally deployed ex ante, in-process, and ex post. A review of the scenario analysis literature from an operational control perspective leads to the conclusion that ex ante control mechanisms are extensively discussed. In-process control mechanisms are also discussed extensively but only by some authors. Ex post controls are almost never discussed. This suggests that when a scenario analysis goes wrong it cannot be reworked or recovered. This is a surprising implicit proposition and this article uses a case study approach to challenge this omission and to conclude that, like for many other business processes, rework and recovery of scenario analysis can be a legitimate and valuable activity.
机译:有大量关于情景规划的学术文献,表达了对提高情景分析作为一个过程的有效性以及情景方法被滥用的担忧。控制流程执行和对不可预见的事件做出反应以避免下行风险是运营控制的领域。操作控制机制通常在事前、过程中和事后部署。从操作控制的角度回顾情景分析文献得出的结论是,事前控制机制得到了广泛的讨论。过程控制机制也被广泛讨论,但只有一些作者。事后控制几乎从不被讨论。这表明,当情景分析出错时,无法返工或恢复。这是一个令人惊讶的隐含命题,本文使用案例研究方法来挑战这种遗漏,并得出结论,与许多其他业务流程一样,场景分析的返工和恢复可能是一项合法且有价值的活动。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号