Is it the dispute decider's job to pick one of the warring parties' positions and declare it the right one? Or can they come up with a solution that neither party argued for? The Multiplex vs Mott MacDonald dispute is interesting in itself. Interesting as well is a remark or two from the senior judge in the case. "It is commonplace in dispute resolution that the judge, arbitrator or adjudicator may come to a decision that is somewhat different from that advanced by any individual party." And if I may add: I agree ... and it causes the individual party to reach for their head and pull out great fistfuls of hair.
展开▼